Thank You Curtis Gregorash
This morning when I woke up I had never heard your name, I read my Herald and you have restored my faith in humanity.
In my experience we are riddled with corruption .It is concealed by those who work for it, intentionally, through ignorance and others for self preservation.
At last there is some one who not only has the values to resign but also the guts to speak out .We need more like you Curtis , there is actually strength in numbers and wouldn’t that just make such a difference on the integrity of New Zealand.
Corruption is like cancer. You can deny you have it but in the end the symptoms will be too bad and it will either become obvious or you simply pop your clogs.
I Stood as an Independent Candidate for Epsom to highlight the corruption issue. I think I have contributed to the exposure of it but only in a minor way as what I have had to say has as usual been well concealed, yes the media play their part in the concealment too .
I happen to think that if the improper swearing in of police officers is a significant issue then a fraudulent application for Law enforcement powers and as a result having this granted to a fictitious organization would also be of significance. The Animal welfare Institute of New Zealand (AWINZ )enforced the animal welfare act for some 10 years despite having any identifiable legal persons revealed behind this trading name. Ultimately four people, who together have no evidence of having run the ” organisation ” and who MPI have no record of being the applicant , sought to have the law enforcement status revoked
Both National and Labour are involved in this corruption, and it is not as if it has not been raised with Government departments the office of the auditor general, Ombudsmen , SFO, MPI , Solicitor General , office of the prime minister etc did not know, they all knew and all played their part.
We have preciously highlighted the reason for that , it is because they all support Transparency International New Zealand . And What does Transparency International – New Zealand Know about corruption ? apparently not much , they know how to deny that corruption exists just look who supports them in their quest to portray that New Zealand is the least corrupt country . In the end Transparency New Zealand is a business and needs to be paid . Rule 1. never bite the hand that feeds.
Come to think of it Transparency International New Zealand has been surprisingly quite during the election campaign .
Then the other item which was of news this week was that There are reports that Chinese communist party anti-corruption officials are looking to investigate suspects in New Zealand.
Mr Peter Goodfellow got involved in the matter as mentioned in the article but we have found connections with him and Oravida see Nationals multiple connections with Oravida – is it all about scampi ?
Then there is the issue of the Crarfar farms and he manner in which New Zealand farm land is being bought up in a most non transparent way and here again we have a connection with Oravida through their former director who resigned from Orvida one day and set up with those involved in making an application for the farms the next day and then doing so deceptively in my opinion through a British Virgin Islands Company Is there an obligation to comply with directions of the Overseas investment office ?
New Zealand is all about big business we are happy to facilitate anything from International money laundering to selling off our land to unknown persons all the while we have this pretense of being squeaky clean
Three years later and another election later nothing much has changed in the mean time brand NZ has been damaged by having our companies registered here through our slack company registration processes being used in international money laundering and fraud.
We dont learn from our mistakes , we allow the real criminals to use our justice system to conceal corruption and beat up whistle blowers.
The Government and its employees all stand on the side line and are complicit. I takes a very special person to make a stand . I have heard far too may say, “I am just a few years off retirement I dont want to rock the boat. ‘ Those who remember the old TV program Gliding On.. Well Its alive and well .
I am preparing my submissions for the commission against corruption petition which was presented in June , let us hope that people vote wisely and that we will see the C word ( corruption ) Used a lot more and also see actions to combat it.
Not too long ago we posted an article with regards to Milk New Zealand Holding , this is the company which is purportedly owned by Shangai Pengxin
The office of overseas investment OIO Assessment at page four stated
The Applicant is Milk New Zealand Holding Limited (“the Applicant”), a Hong Kong incorporated company which is an
overseas person under the Act.
The Applicant will register as an overseas company under the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 prior to acquiring the Investment.
It transpired that the applicant did not comply with this direction instead another company named Milk New Zealand Holding was registered as a New Zealand company with a share holder initially unidentified but later revealed to be Milk New Zealand Investment a company registered in the British Virgin islands .
I requested information from the companies office through FYI and a response has been received .
MILK NEW ZEALAND INVESTMENT LIMITED is indeed registered in the British Virgin islands , but the companies register there does not disclose who the share holders are .
The British Virgin Islands company was registered on 24 May 2012 , the company which registers off shore incorporation has provided a certificate of incumbency which presumably is only accurate as at the date it was issued.
Additionally the final paragraph it states that the register may be kept elsewhere and their records may not be up to date .. so fat lot of use that certificate is .
But going back to the instructions of the OIO it states The Applicant will register as an overseas company under the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 prior to acquiring the Investment.
The agreement therefore between the applicant and the government has not been complied with and the Purchaser has no obligations to fulfill the conditions as the purchaser is not the applicant , it is a grand son who has the same name .
It is the company in between the applicant and purchaser which is of concern as this is the weakest and a very non transparent link in the chain .
I wonder if any one will do anything about it ? I have sent the open letter below to the ministers .
Sent: Wednesday, 10 September 2014 10:01 a.m.
To: ‘email@example.com'; ‘firstname.lastname@example.org'; ‘email@example.com’
Open letter to the Ministers of finance, land information and economic development and OIA request
I wish to draw your attention to the fact that the purchaser of the Crafar farms was not the company which applied to and was approved by the OIO
The directions of the OIO appear to have been ignored , these were that “The Applicant will register as an overseas company under the New Zealand Companies Act 1993 prior to acquiring the Investment.”
The resulting group of companies went on to purchase more farms and a deception/error occurred which caused the OIO to state at point 16 of the application for the purchase of the Synlait farms
“In 2012, Milk NZ was granted consent to acquire 16 dairy farms known as the Crafar Farms (“Crafar Farms”). Consent was granted subject to extensive conditions, including annual reporting. The Overseas Investment Office has recently received Milk NZ’s first annual report and is satisfied that Milk NZ is not in breach of any conditions of consent.”
But the report which was produced was not from the applicant in the Crafar application but from a company which has the same name and purports to descend from the applicant.
The statement on the OIO web site states “Milk New Zealand Holding Limited (Milk NZ), the company that purchased the 16 former Crafar Farms last year, has submitted its first annual report to the Overseas Investment Office (OIO).” This statement is true however it was not the company which was approved to purchase the farms , it was in effect a name sake with questionable genealogy.
The annual report furnished further complicates matter s by referring to the purchaser of the farms as being Pengxin New Zealand Farm Group, which is a subsidiary of Milk new Zealand Holding (NZ) as opposed to a direct subsidiary of Milk New Zealand Holding, (HK) the applicant . As a fraud investigator I am aware that through the use of names assumptions can be made which divert those who accept the assumption away from the truth.
In between the company ,which was the applicant Milk NZ holding ( HK) and milk New Zealand Holding ( NZ) is a non-transparent and unscreened ,unapproved entity called Milk New Zealand investments .This has a certificate of incumbency dated 5 december 2013, which by its own disclaimer may or may not be accurate.
Milk New Zealand holding the applicant is not the purchaser or the direct owner of the purchaser and this may bring about issues of its own as the purchaser is not a party to any of the conditions agreed to with the OIO .
There appears to be a disconnect between the OIO and the MED . No one has verified that the applicant has been properly registered as directed as an overseas company under the New Zealand Companies Act 1993.
It would appear that the provisions of the act specified under the heading Overseas companies has not been complied with .
As per section 15 of the companies act, each company is a separate legal entity , therefore the applicant considered by the OIO and the purchaser are two separate legal persons.
By way of OIA please provide copies of any documents in which any of the ministers or ministries have considered the fact that the applicant in the Crafar farms deal was not the purchaser . And please provide copies of any consents which have allowed the purchaser to be different from the applicant .
I ask this under urgency due to the Lochinvar station being negotiated and if falsehoods exist then this should be addressed prior to the sale going through.
What would happen if the silent majority was not silent ?
Imagine if every one who is eligible to vote voted .
The undecided would become the deciders and we may all be better off because of them .
Instead of not voting if all non voters voted for nothing but ” other minority parties ” which received .48% of the vote in the last elections their vote take woudl be increased to 34.63% which would be 3.47% more than National got in the last elections .
Now wouldn’t that be a left field game changer ?
These minority parties would be in a position to form a government with any one . They could actually form a Government with every one except national and Labour .
They could throw out consultants, advisers and just runt eh country on good old common sense .
It would be any ones guess who would be prime minister but I certainly do hope that the first thing this parliament would address is corruption .
I have no doubts that those in the Grey are those who can help us beat the 1% .. are you in ????
What is the point of having laws if there is no accountability to it?
We have screeds of legislation which applies to lawyers but just about every time a complaint made to the law society comes back with the words that the lawyer concerned does not meet the threshold for that rule or offence or it is written off in some other lame manner without real consideration of the rule has been breached or not .
We appear to have allowed a Grey area creep into law a decision which says technically they have broken the rules or ignored them but we dont think that it has done serious damage. Should we perhaps re write our laws so that the law can be broken by 5% , 10% or even totally ignored or sat theft is not a theft is the sum is less than , or too bad he stole your TV but because it was old it doesn’t matter. Or simply apply the law selectively to people who you think has good reputation which will be tarnished by a conviction regardless of the facts.
I think I may have hit the problem on the head there as our legal system is built on the 12 the century legal concept in Britain.There were four inns of court Grays Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, Inner Temple, Middle temple , the links will take you on a fascinating voyage of discovery .
It is perhaps not very surprising that the words Bar, standing and Inns are all associated with the law .That is why only those standing can be at the bar, I can only guess that the others were under the table or dead in a corner .
Through the involvement of the Knights Templar and the inns, religion was a tool used control those both in the Inns and those on whom the law was practiced. The Fear that some harm would befall them would get any one to confess except those who secretly knew that you could tell lies and get away with it.
But fast forward to 2014, knights in shining amour are out, religion has been shown not to deliver the thunder bolts and lighting to those who do not speak the truth or act honourably . So what do we do we say to the lawyers go and form an organization and control yourselves. New Zealand Law Society
As a safe guard we set up the LCRO to which you can appeal if you dont like what the law society does but we make certain that the people on the LCRO are appointed in consultation with the law society and also funded by them.
Because of the lack of funds the LCRO is desperately under resourced and there appears to be a wait of some 2 years before the matter is determined by the LCRO , evidence of this is shown in the dates of the determinations .
To expedite matters and to make it appear that most of the lawyers are good guys the law society ” writes the complaint off ” in their early resolution process, this has the effect that people just done bother making complaints as it is simply a waste of their time. Their actions with lawyers are more akin to that of a mother of a very spoiled only child , rather than a mother of 10 who in years gone by would have given the culprit a good reason to remember why he has to stick to the rules.
I have only ever had one successful complaint to the law society and that took 3 years to complete . I was to get $30,000 after false invoices had been issued .
As a former police officer I find it appalling that a person with the full weight and responsibility of upholding the law and being an officer of the court can commit acts which when I was a police officer were crimes .I have seen people locked up for stealing a packet of tobacco yet here I have been deprived of a massive sum through false accounting and the offender is now suing me for bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy and liquidation are two processes used to ” take some one out ” which liquidation of a company is the equivalent of killing off an opponent, bankruptcy is as close as you can legally get to bopping off a person who gets in your way and if they resit they will son find that another $3,000 is added to the bill.
This week a Lawyer was jailed for stealing from clients this brings about the question, what is the threshold for theft? In my day a theft was a theft but it appears that now thefts are acceptable up to a certain limit.
I have also become aware that the law society has a process which takes time and does not allow for intervention . Since filing my complaint with regards to my former lawyer in February 2011, he has taken me to court no less than five times and my matter has still not been resolved.
He is currently trying to bankrupt me over $3,000 and sue me for $500,000 . All these court processes have strict time frames and is taking my time. It has occurred to me that if he bankrupts me for $3,000 all my issues will go away and when your broke there is no point in coming after you for more dosh cause your bankrupt.. It must be the best place to be. Perhaps my former lawyer is trying to make me an example after all he is in the business of setting up trusts so that people can hide their money overseas . I know I wont get a cent from him as he , despite his business connections does not hold assets in his own name.
A very good example of how the process is abused is that my former lawyer who was struck off as a lawyer but has had a reprieve and can practice again if the was to get a practicing certificate , is apparently running his practice through a Proxy, a very junior junior who is working under the supervision of a lawyer in Alexandra and claiming to be a branch of that law firm and having incorporated both law firms names into the trading name for the branch.
The very junior lawyer operates from the premises of the former law firm and any one not knowing would think that it is business as usual at the former law firm . I rather suspect that she is being given Practice experience by suing me, all it can do is cost me money because if I hired a lawyer and was going to get a cost payment in favour of me, my former lawyer would simply skip the country .
Now I consider taking court action without any evidence as an abuse of process , it is akin to beating some one up with a piece of 4 x2 and saying sorry wrong person , didn’t mean to hurt you .
But the law society will no doubt look at this and say no harm done and leave the door wide open to the next lawyer to make the same mistake.
In the mean time the person who has had the court action filed agaisnt them has how many sleepless nights?
This ” mistake ‘ is actually a breach of the rules and the law society has a duty to keep lawyers accountable to the rules , but the reality is that it works well for lawyers not to be hard on this kind of thing as it gives them something to put pressure on people with .
This is not the only mistake there have been many .
It is for such incidents , that I believe that the law society should not be the both the body which disciplines lawyers and holds them accountable . I have drawn up a petition to segregate the functions of the law society being 65 Regulatory functions and 66 Representative functions. And to ask the government to set up one organization which is dependent of Lawyers and only has the regulatory functions so as to hold lawyers truly accountable to the law.
A matter follows from complaint to law society , to LCRO to tribunal and even after that there is appeal
I am 4 years in on my matter and we have not hit the LCRO yet , the LCRO will need at least 6 months to make a decision then there can be an appeal to the tribunal . Bankruptcy is just a few months so it is a lot easier for the lawyer to beat up his complainant than it is for the complainant to get justice .
We need a process which work as fast as a bankruptcy application does, a process during which administrators can intervene and assess all court action between the parties and ensure that only matters are filed which have followed the rules, proper negotiation and for which there is evidence.
No more soft touch for lawyers. They need to be held accountable to the law to a Higher degree than the people who they proceed against . You can help by singing the petition
The petition is down loadable here Petition for an independent lawyers authority
Several days ago the press reported that Rawshark the alleged hacker is retiring . at the time his Twitter account @Whaledump was suspended and he tweeted through an alternative account that
The account posted that “every device used in this operation will have been destroyed and disposed of along with all the decryption keys” by the time the tweet was read.
Who ever Rawshark is must be aware of stories like mine, what happens to a whistle blower in New Zealand.
Heaven forbid that ordinary people should listen to a whistle blower, that would shatter the illusion, the perception that new Zealand is the least corrupt country. so this is how we deal with whistle blowers in New Zealand
1. Discredit them. take the focus from the actual incident and place it on another event which will be contorted to make the whistle blower appear as though they are driven by revenge. This is part of the concept of DARVO
In my case I had worked on a trust with Mr Wells, The Auckland air cadet trust. I had been the treasurer for 19 Squadron and knew how hard the kids worked for their money , most of it was to keep the motor glider GOD in the air.
When I took over the accounts for the AACT , they were a mess , the trust was losing $1500 per month , I straightened up the books asked hard questions and for my efforts was kicked off the trust by Neil Wells who was chair man and without warning stood before the other trustees and read from some notes telling them that I was bringing the trust into disrepute and needed to be removed. . I could not understand what was going on I felt totally Bullied and demanded evidence . The evidence never came and the notes which Wells had read from disappeared. The rules of the trust were re negotiated so that Wells had the numbers to remove me as trustee . As a result of this I sent aFax to him at his work telling him that I believed him to be the greatest bully I had ever encountered. ( for the record the kids no longer fly, the building they got had a massive cost and a 10 year lease.. how stupid is that ? I suspect the trust was supposed to go under that is why he had to get rid of me I ruined that plan )
As a result of this Fax I received a phone call From Lyn Macdonald the bird lady, she was at the time a council dog control oficer and was concered that she was required to volunteer her council paid time to an organisation which Mr Wells appeared to run called the Animal welfare Institute Of New Zealand AWINZ
She put me in touch with Robert Frittmann whose cat had been unlawfully euthanized on the authority of AWINZ. Robert, a security officer at the time, had tried but failed find the “organisation” and failed to get accountability.see the news item Couple demand compensation for dead cat.
It was a council officer who came under the auspices of AWINZ who had used the animal welfare act to illegally remove the cat. Tom Didovich the council Manager at the time wrote to Mr Frittmann
Like Robert ,I could not find who or What AWINZ was so together with Robert and one other person we set up a trust called the Animal welfare Institute of New Zealand so as to confirm that an organisation existed as a legal person or not.
We were successful in registering our name proving that no organization by the name Of teh Animal welfare institute of New Zealand existed in New Zealand
Had AWINZ existed the matter would have finished there. I would have told the parties who and what the organisation was, instead I found that it did not exist in any legal or identifiable form. In stead we asked Questions of Both the council and MAF as to why an unidentifiable non existent organization was enforcing animal welfare law and why they were contacting to an apparently fictional Organization .
MAF had believed that AWINZ had existed as a legal person and had infact been assured of its existence, nut no one had checked. So Six years after this unknown and legally non existent person took on law enforcement authority Told Mr Wells was told to register AWINZ . But of course he couldn’t do this because we had the name . So he recruited some support and tried to pressure us into submission , just like he had removed me off the trust.
And so I came under 8 years of attack , the aim was to do as much financial damage as possible and in so doing they also destroyed my marriage and my family. We are just collateral damage to keep this secret under cover.
I find it interesting that twice now there has been intervention because police officers were not correctly sworn but one of two private Law enforcement authorities was a total fiction and we address that by throwing up walls and blinkers and pretending that it never happened. So much so that I cannot get the press to publish anything.
I often get calls from Would be whistle blowers this week from a person who was concerned with the council again contracting to unidentifiable persons this time Dialect Communications who received $8,000 in rate payers money . I have also raised the issue of 3/4 Million Len Brown received from the New Auckland council trust. No doubt his term of office will be over before the police finish their investigations .
The court also likes to back up lawyers on claims of fictional organisations and in my latest judgment from the court the Judge . Patricia Cunningham , goes out of her way to attack me instead of addressing the issue . Needles to say since I was not a party to those proceedings the party involved, Our now renamed Animal owner support trust has filed an appeal.
So folks that is how we keep our least corrupt status by destroying any one who has the audacity to say.. “but surely that wrong” that is how we are the least corrupt.. we simply bully people into silence speak up and lose your home and Family… Pretty good for the least corrupt country isn’t it ? So lets all dash out and vote for the parties which support corruption , National and Act . ( I have a silent hope for LabourAndrew little presented my petition for a commission against corruption .)
Last Week Penny Bright and I did a joint presentation on corruption to the good people of Helensville .
Vinnie arranged for it to be recorded through Barak Ford, I didn’t even know that it was going to be posted but am pleased it was hope you find time to watch it .
the video was Hugely popular look what happened the account has been blocked . So I have posted this instead it should serve as a warning to us all
Where has freedom of speech and right to share information gone?
It is funny that you don’t notice things until they go wrong. I have had cause to look closer at the statutory body the New Zealand law Society since being involved with a complaint regarding my former lawyer
The New Zealand law Society is set up by statute and is tasked with two functions
The regulatory functions of the New Zealand Law Society are—
(a) to control and regulate the practice in New Zealand by barristers and by barristers and solicitors of the profession of the law:
(b) to uphold the fundamental obligations imposed on lawyers who provide regulated services in New Zealand:
(c) to monitor and enforce the provisions of this Act, and of any regulations and rules made under it, that relate to the regulation of lawyers:
(d) to monitor and enforce, throughout the period specified in any order made under section 390, the provisions of this Act, and of any regulations and rules made under it, that relate to the regulation of conveyancers:
(e) to assist and promote, for the purpose of upholding the rule of law and facilitating the administration of justice in New Zealand, the reform of the law.
At the same time “The representative functions of the New Zealand Law Society are to represent its members and to serve their interests.”
That to me as illustrated in my experience is where the conflict arises.
Going back in history Law fuel records that
A Background By way of background, we observe there was clearly tension between xxxxxxx and Harrison J. It is plain from the record that Harrison J had concerns about xxxxxxx approach and competency.”
In fact in 2010 the herald reported that Drug rape accused told to replace lawyer in this article it states that the judge told Nieuwenhuiysen to “get somebody who is competent”.
Don’t get me wrong Shaurya Malaviya who was the lawyer before the court on that occasion was not to blame he was a very junior lawyer used By xxxxxxv in the same manner as the young Korean girl working from his office is now being used.
Kids straight out of law school are pushed straight off in to the deep end. Shaurya dealt with my matters relating to a defamation claim brought By Neil Wells who had made a false application to the minister and by deceit obtained law enforcement powers under legislation which he had drafted and advised on .
Attack is the best form of defence and I was attacked because I pointed out that the trust which allegedly made the application did not exit.
My former lawyer took the matter through to Judicial review and appeal. he failed in both. He also dealt with my matrimonial property division of the resulting marriage breakdown due to the stress and costs of the proceedings agaisnt me .
In all I paid the law firm s just short of $100,000. I got total incompetence which included items being written into my deed of settlement after I had signed it.
The Law Society held that this was not an issue as I had subsequently consented to it.. The truth is that I only found at the time of settlement and it was basically a matter of extortion, give in or we won’t settle. Being penniless and having all my assets tied up in the settlement proposal forced me to agree… so it transpires if you consent under duress there is no offence.
What the law society did uphold was the false invoicing, however they did not investigate with view of criminal charges for false accounting but they did get an assessment done by an independent assessor. I was happy to accept the result that I was to get some $30,000 back which was pretty much what the false invoicing proved. the line they tread is about giving the complainant something while protecting their members.
Three years had elapsed since I had made my complaint and in the intervening time I had been taken to the cleaners by Mr Wells and had my company placed into liquidation on false affidavits . I was financially stripped which is a tactic they use to stop you from fighting back .
Mr Wells got something like $30,000 just in interest from me but the sum ordered by the law society to be repaid by my former lawyer was just the net amount different rules for different people no matter what you lose.
my former lawyer refuses to pay .He has told me that he will never pay me , I believe him . Had he been a lawyer overseas he probably would have been charged with false accounting but the law society having both role of nurturer and disciplinarian takes the middle road and gets him to refund it.
All is well as long as he is a lawyer but it appears that despite being able to practice again he has not taken any steps to do so, it is far to convenient to act through a proxy .. no responsibility or accountability .
I believe that if we had a statutory body which dealt only with lawyers disciplinary matters and not “to serve their interests” then the role of caretaker and disciplinarian would be separate and not conflicted
I see too many decisions come back stating that the threshold has not been reached.. which threshold is that ? isn’t it a question of whether or not the member has broken the rule or complied with it, isn’t that the threshold ? .
The rules are the minimum standard, not a suggested code , lawyers need to keep to the rules , some will need a warning others a slap on the wrist and yet others the full force of the law . We cannot protect favorites and we cannot persecute those who challenge us, discipline has to be equal and fair.
so I am going to do something I have had the wording approved for my Petition . it reads
Grace Haden and Respectfully requests:
”That the House legislate to resolve the conflict of interest which exists in the New Zealand Law Society having both the regulatory functions and the representative functions for lawyers, by setting up a separate independent regulatory authority whose sole purpose is to ensure lawyers accountability to the rule of law. . “
this is the petition will you help ?
Hands up all those who have more than $500 per week to spare ? .. didn’t see many hands go up , last year it was reported that the average household income was $85,000 , the median being $68,600 that works out at $40.87 per hour and 32.98 per hour per house hold .
Now lets look at lawyers hourly rates starting at $225 to upward of $500 per hour . are you seeing what I am seeing. Disproportionate.. to say the least.
If some one charges manifestly higher wages than the average person can earn does this or does this not conjure up an expectation of competence , experience. … No wrong …. the price you pay your lawyer has nothing to do with his ability to perform it has however got everything to do with his desire to get rich.
The law is far from simple and straight forward it is unnecessarily complicated so that the average person cannot represent themselves in court . This is hugely beneficial to the rich who like to use the scorched earth approach to financially strip their opponents. They can afford the lawyers who have the right connections because that is all it takes in the New Zealand Legal system.. contacts.
Whether you win or lose has nothing to do with truth, facts and evidence, it is about your lawyers ability to play the rules, cheat and mislead the court. If you have an honest lawyer you are sunk before you even kick off.
I have long believed that an act which is a criminal act can be legal if it is done through a lawyer and with the aid of the court. In this way our courts are used to pervert the course of justice.
While the rules of practice are allegedly there to protect you the reality, as I have experienced it is that they do little to offer you any protection .
I questioned corruption a fictional organisation had obtained law enforcement powers , so the “least Corrupt country ” has to cover this up
I am taken to court for defamation, denied a defence of truth and honest opinion and ordered to pay more than any criminal would be subjected to , nearly $100,000
I hire a lawyer but have to let him go when my bank accounts are frozen due to pressure being put on my marriage .
I meet a human rights lawyer in court he says he can help he is a Jew a Buddhist and I am sure any religion that you can mention, its all about establishing affinity
He tells me that he is a victim of the system too and then he rips me off . he gives me invoices which do not have invoice numbers on them and when I insist on time sheets I get time sheet invoices which are clearly made up and duplicate each other.
I take the matter up with the law society and four years later I have not had one cent back and instead I have been sued four times by this lawyer
Why should a person making a genuine complaint about their lawyer after not being properly represented by them, having been given false invoices then have to endure four more bouts of court action.
Each time the judge looks over their glasses and says.. you really should have legal support.
Well your honour the last time I did I was represented by an incompetent lawyer, so incompetent that the law society struck him off for being incompetent( amongst other things ) he also ensured that I am in my present financial demise and again I am being beaten up by using the court.
This lawyer who I believe is working through a proxy lawyer supplied by his business partner is playing every dirty trick in the book. they say that they will accept service by email then claim they cant open the documents. I go to serve the documents personally and get a trespass notice for my efforts.
These guys are involved in activities which others wold be locked up for in My day as a cop issuing false invoices and taking legal action on false documents were criminal offences. Instead they take me to bankruptcy court while trying to fleece me for $500,000 because I traced a company involved in international money laundering back to his wife. strangely enough He is complaining of my freedom of speech yet that is an issue which he promoted when he called a Judge names
Going to court on Thursday morning will keep you posted .. NZ where criminals rule .( that is my honest opinion .. and the criminals are invariably those with law degrees and members of select clubs )
We have our chance to make a change but most people simply don’t want to know until it happens to them.
I have a simple three point policy which gets me into a lot of trouble. I would honestly do much better to be like the majority of New Zealanders and accept everything i see and every thing I hear and not question anything.
There is a certain Blissfulness in ignorance .
I have done my own research which supports the notion that John Key , a Wall street Banker has been put incharge of the share portfolio called New Zealand.
If you have seen the film the wolf of wall street you will relate to the BS which is spun to sell anything to any one. this is called NLP Neuro linguistic Programming , basically selling ice to the Eskimos.
This approach cannot stand scrutiny and a list of 140 or so of these incidents are listed on the standard http://thestandard.org.nz/an-honest-man/
I believe this has been updated but this is the list as it stood in April
01 – I promise to always be honest
02 – We’re not proposing to change the Employment Relations Act in a way that weakens unions
03 – we are not going to sack public servants, the attrition rate will reduce costs
04 – we are not going to cut working for families
05 – I firmly believe in climate change and always have
06 – We seek a 50% reduction in New Zealand’s carbon-equivalent net emissions, as compared to 1990 levels, by 2050. 50 by 50. We will write the target into law.
07 – National Ltd™ will provide a consistent incentive for both biofuel and biodiesel by exempting them from excise tax or road user charges
08 – I didn’t know about The Bretheren election tactics
09 – If they came to us now with that proposal [re trans-Tasman Therapeutic Goods regime], we will sign it
10 – I can’t remember my position on the 1981 Springbok Tour
11 – Tranzrail shares
12 – I did not mislead the House (1)
13 – Lord Ashcroft
14 – National Ltd™ would not have sent troops into Iraq
15 – Standard & Poors credit downgrade
16 – the double-down grade doesn’t really matter and its only about private sector debt
17 – I did not mislead the House (2)
18 – I didn’t say I want wages to drop
19 – the real rate of inflation is 3.3 percent.
20 – the tourism sector has not lost 7,000 jobs
21 – no I have never heard of Whitechapel
22 – I won’t raise GST
23 – people who are on the average wage and have a child are $48 a week better off after the rise in GST
24 – the purchase of farmland, by overseas buyers will be limited to ten farms per purchase
25 – the Pike River Mine was consented to under a Labour Government
26 – no promises were made to get the remains of the miners out of the Pike River mine
27 – I did not provide a view on the safety of the Pike River coalmine
28 – I did not mislead the House (3)
29 – capping, not cutting the public service
30 – raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour will cost 6000 jobs
31 – north of $50 a week
32 – privatisation won’t significantly help the economy
33 – wave goodbye to higher taxes , not your loved ones
34 – I never offered Brash a diplomatic job in London
35 – Tariana Turia is “totally fine” with the Tuhoe Treaty Claim deal
36 – Kiwisaver
37 – National Ltd™ is not going to radically reorganise the structure of the public sector
38 – tax cuts won’t require additional borrowing
39 – New Zealand does not have a debt problem
40 – New Zealand troops in Afghanistan will only be involved in training, not fighting
41 – the wage gap between New Zealand and Australia has closed under my National Ltd™ government
42 – It took 9 years for Labour to make a complete and utter mess of the economy
43 – National Ltd™ has changed the Overseas Investment Act to include 19 different criteria
44 – the price of goods and services has risen by 6 per cent since the last election, while the has actually gone up by 16 per cent
45 – no, although its a week ago and here I am being interviewed on television about them, I havn’t seen Gerry Brownlee’s comments regarding demolitions in Christchurch and which caused such outrage, but I can talk all about them
47 – the use of the Vela brother’s helicopter was required so I could attend meetings relating to national/international security concerns
50 – oh, maybe our SAS soldiers were in the Kabul hotel gun fight but they weren’t wounded by friendly fire
51 – New Zealand has lost $12 billion from GDP due to the Christchurch earthquake . . . oh, it might actually be around $15 billion from GDP due to the Christchurch earthquake . . . Blinglish said what?
52 – 10,000 houses will have to be demolished in Christchurch due to the earthquake
53 – 14,000 new apprentices will start training over the next five years, over and above the number previously forecast
54 – Our amendments to the ETS ensure we will continue to do our fair share internationally
55 – we are committed to honouring our Kyoto Protocol obligations
56 – any changes to the ETS will be fiscally neutral
57 – we [NZ] have grown for eight of the last nine quarters”
58 – National Ltd™ will tender out the government banking contract
59 – we will be back in surplus by 2014-15
60 – Nicky Hager’s book “Other People’s Wars” is a work of fiction
61 – unemployment is starting to fall
62 – we have created 60,000 jobs
63 – we have created 45,000 jobs
64 – the 2011 Budget will create in the order of 170,000 jobs
65 – I don’t know if I own a vineyard
66 – no, I did not mislead the House (5)
67 – the Isreali spy killed in the Christchurch quake had “only one” passport
68 – the Police will not need to make savings by losing jobs
69 – GCSB re Kim Dotcom x 3 (that we know about)
70 – I did not mislead the House (6)
71 – I voted to keep the drinking age at 20
72 – New Zealand is 100% Pure
73 – I’ve been prime minister for four years, and it’s really 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year
74 – baseball in New Zealand is attracting more government support
75 – the decision to buy brand new BMWs was made by the Department of Internal Affairs without reference either to their minister or to me
76 – I didn’t have a clue that Ministerial Services, which I am in charge of, was going to buy brand new BMWs
77 – even though two of my ministers knew all about it, I didn’t have a clue that brand new BMWs were being bought.
78 – even though my Chief of Staff met with officials to discuss purchase of the the brand new BMWs, I didn’t have a clue
79 – Labour forced us into buying the brand new BMWs, its their fault
80 – ummm, look, sorry about that BMW thing , it was because I was so upset about the death of a New Zealand soldier and Julia Gillard was visit too
81 – the public demanded that we change the labour laws for The Hobbit
82 – “The Hobbit” created 3000 new jobs
83 – we have delivered 800 extra doctors in the public service
84 – I did not mislead the House (7)
85 – I wasn’t working at Elders when the sham foreign exchange deals took place
86 – I was starting School Certificate exams in 1978
87 – I don’t know who arrived on the CIA jet to visit the spies I am responsible for
88 – reducing barriers to property developers will increase the availability of affordable housing
89 – Labour left the economy in poor shape
90 – forecasts show unemployment will fall
91 – we have closed the wage gap with Australia by $27
92 – Ngati Porou and Whanau Apanui are not opposed to mining
93 – I have not had any meetings with Media Works
94 – our [NZ's] terms of trade remain high
95 – the TPP is an example of democracy
96 – National Ltd™ will use the proceeds of state asset sales to invest in other public assets, like schools and hospitals
97 – New Zealand troops will be out of Afghanistan by April 2013
98 – overseas investment in New Zealand adds to what New Zealanders can invest on their own
99 – overseas investment in New Zealand creates jobs, boosts incomes, and helps the economy grow
100 – National Ltd™ will build 2000 houses over the next two years
101 – there are only 4 New Zealand SAS soldiers in Bamiyan and all working in the area of logistics and planning only
102 – selling state assets will give cash equity to those companies
103 – the Sky City deal doesn’t mean more pokies
104 – there was nothing improper about the Sky City deal
105 – my office has had no correspondence, no discussions, no involvement with the Sky City deal
106 – SkyCity will only get “a few more” pokie machines at the margins
107 – any changes to gambling regulations will be subject to a full public submission process
108 – Sky City has approached TVNZ about the purchase/use of government-owned land
109 – the Auditor General has fully vindicated National over the Sky City deal
110 – there’s a 50/50 chance the Hobbit is going off shore unless we do something
111 – David Shearer has signed up for the purchase of shares in Mighty River
112 – Solid Energy asked the government for a $1 billion capital investment
113 – fracking has been going safely on in Taranaki for the past 30 years without any issues
114 – no front line positions will be lost at DoC
115 – Iain Rennie came to me and recommended Fletcher for the GCSB job
116 – I forgot that after I scrapped the shortlist for GCSB job I phoned a life-long friend to tell him to apply for the position
117 – I told Iain Rennie I would contact Fletcher
118 – for 30 years, or three decades, I didn’t have any dinners or lunches or breakfasts with Ian Fletche
119 – I did not mislead the House (8)
120 – No, I did not say we would follow the US and Australia into a war against North Korea
121 – I paid for that lunch and I’ve got the credit card bill to prove it
122 – I called directory service to get Ian Fletcher’s number
123 – I did not mislead the house (9)
124 – I am honest and upfront
125 – cyber terrorists have attempted to gain access to information about weapons of mass destruction held on New Zealand computers
126 – the illegal spying on Kim Dotcom was an isolated incident
127 – New Zealand has an arrangement to have asylum seekers processed in Australian detention camps
128 – the law which says the GCSB cannot spy on New Zealanders is not clear
129 – the only way net new jobs can be created is by private investors putting their money into businesses in New Zealand
130 – an increase in the number of people looking for work indicates that confidence is returning to the economy
131 – the 10 percent of taxpayers in New Zealand who are the top earners pay 76 percent of all net personal tax.
132 – I did not mislead the House (10)
133 – the substantial wage growth under Labour was eroded by inflation
134 – National Ltd™’s 2010 tax changes were fiscally neutral
135 I did not mislead the House (11)
136 – the bulk of New Zealanders earn between $45,000 and $75,000 a year
137 – Pike River Coal did not put profits and its production ahead of the safety and lives of those 29 workers.
138 – Radio Live had sought advice from the Electoral Commission about my show just before the election
139 – it is because of National Ltd™’s policies that the price of fresh fruit and vegetables has dropped.
140 – the length-of-the-country cycleway will create 4000 jobs.
141 – police training for next year has not has not been cancelled
142 – National Ltd™ has only cut back-office jobs in the health service
143 – The Crown’s dividend stream from the Meridians, the Mighty Rivers of the world is large and there is no motivation to sell assets
144 – Gross.
Few New Zealanders have woken up to the fact that the court is being used to asset strip many of them. The NZ we grew up in was not very litigious but with house prices soaring it is now worth you while to sue some one to get hold of their money.
Single New Zealanders are the prime target. I recently worked with a man who had had what he thought was a casual affair but the cunning foreign vixen made certain that she kept popping up in his life to cover off the three years.
They never lived together for more than a month and even then there were only two such ” trial periods” she retained he housing corp home and her benefit throughout .
Now she wants half his house despite the fact that he is married to some one else .
Lawyers are required to use the law only for a lawful purpose, but like kids out of control , they are willing to push boundaries to areas where logic does not go.
Take for example the court proceedings which have been commenced against me on behalf of my former lawyer .
My former lawyer took nearly $100,000 from me , altered my matrimonial property deed ( or allowed it to be altered ) without my knowledge and consent after I had signed it and gave what I consider to be fraudulent invoices.
Four years later he has me in court for the fourth time taking me for Bankruptcy for a sum of $3,000 when he owes me at least $30,000 and defamation for publishing news stories which show at the companies he sets up through his wife are involved in international money laundering and fraud. All I did as to trace the companies through the companies register ( a public register ) back to His wife .
see the story NZ shell company linked to alleged $150m fraud the company Falcona Systems Ltd is 100% owned by Interhold Registered Office Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, 100% owned by GENHOLD LIMITED Registered Office Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, owned 100% by TRUST (NZ) HOLDINGS LIMITEDRegistered Office Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, owned 1000% by his Wife.
The Chernomoreneftegas Case: In 2011 companies headed by Vanagels and Gorin won an Ukrainan government order in a tender on behalf of state-owned oil company Chernomoreneftegas, Ukraine’s Black Sea oil producer, for the delivery of $400m worth of oil drilling equipment. The tender was won by Cardiff-registered Highway Investment Processing LLP, which lists Stan Gorin as a director according to the UK’s Companies House. The only other company to “compete” in the tender was Falcona Systems Limited, registered in New Zealand and listing another Latvian, Inta Bilder, as director. It will come as no surprise that this company was founded by Interhold, which lists the ubiquitous Erik Vanagels as a director. In other words, there was no competition for the oil equipment order. The producer’s price for the oil equipment was only $248.5m, so someone made a handsome $150m profit from the deal for doing nothing more than some paperwork. The main oligarch related to this deal is Yuriy Boyko, Ukrainian Minister of Energy and Coal Industry.
Vanagles and Stan Gorin are names of Proxy directors which repeatedly crop up in association with international corruption and they both are still directors of the companies which are part of the same company structure .
So there we have it folks . keep your eyes closed for corruption if you see anything dont whisper a word because the Corrupt will use the court to silence you they do because they can and no one holds them accountable.