truthI have a simple  three point policy   which  gets me into a lot of trouble.   I would honestly  do much better to be like   the majority of New Zealanders and accept everything i see and every thing I hear and not question   anything.

There is a certain Blissfulness in ignorance .

I  have done my own research which supports the notion that John Key , a Wall street Banker   has been put incharge of the share portfolio  called New Zealand.

If you have seen the  film  the wolf of wall street you will relate to the  BS  which is spun  to sell anything to any one.  this is called NLP  Neuro linguistic Programming , basically  selling ice to the  Eskimos.


This  approach cannot stand scrutiny  and  a list of 140  or so of these  incidents are listed on  the standard

I believe this has been updated  but this is the  list as it  stood in  April

01 – I promise to always be honest

02 – We’re not proposing to change the Employment Relations Act in a way that weakens unions

03 – we are not going to sack public servants, the attrition rate will reduce costs

04 – we are not going to cut working for families

05 – I firmly believe in climate change and always have

06 – We seek a 50% reduction in New Zealand’s carbon-equivalent net emissions, as compared to 1990 levels, by 2050. 50 by 50. We will write the target into law.

07 – National Ltd™ will provide a consistent incentive for both biofuel and biodiesel by exempting them from excise tax or road user charges

08 – I didn’t know about The Bretheren election tactics

09 – If they came to us now with that proposal [re trans-Tasman Therapeutic Goods regime], we will sign it

10 – I can’t remember my position on the 1981 Springbok Tour

11 – Tranzrail shares

12 – I did not mislead the House (1)

13 – Lord Ashcroft

14 – National Ltd™ would not have sent troops into Iraq

15 – Standard & Poors credit downgrade

16 – the double-down grade doesn’t really matter and its only about private sector debt

17 – I did not mislead the House (2)

18 – I didn’t say I want wages to drop

19 – the real rate of inflation is 3.3 percent.

20 – the tourism sector has not lost 7,000 jobs

21 – no I have never heard of Whitechapel

22 – I won’t raise GST

23 – people who are on the average wage and have a child are $48 a week better off after the rise in GST

24 – the purchase of farmland, by overseas buyers will be limited to ten farms per purchase

25 – the Pike River Mine was consented to under a Labour Government

26 – no promises were made to get the remains of the miners out of the Pike River mine

27 – I did not provide a view on the safety of the Pike River coalmine

28 – I did not mislead the House (3)

29 – capping, not cutting the public service

30 – raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour will cost 6000 jobs

31 – north of $50 a week

32 – privatisation won’t significantly help the economy

33 – wave goodbye to higher taxes , not your loved ones

34 – I never offered Brash a diplomatic job in London

35 – Tariana Turia is “totally fine” with the Tuhoe Treaty Claim deal

36 – Kiwisaver

37 – National Ltd™ is not going to radically reorganise the structure of the public sector

38 – tax cuts won’t require additional borrowing

39 – New Zealand does not have a debt problem

40 – New Zealand troops in Afghanistan will only be involved in training, not fighting

41 – the wage gap between New Zealand and Australia has closed under my National Ltd™ government

42 – It took 9 years for Labour to make a complete and utter mess of the economy

43 – National Ltd™ has changed the Overseas Investment Act to include 19 different criteria

44 – the price of goods and services has risen by 6 per cent since the last election, while the has actually gone up by 16 per cent

45 – no, although its a week ago and here I am being interviewed on television about them, I havn’t seen Gerry Brownlee’s comments regarding demolitions in Christchurch and which caused such outrage, but I can talk all about them

46 – our SAS soldiers were not involved in the Kabul Hotel gunfight

47 – the use of the Vela brother’s helicopter was required so I could attend meetings relating to national/international security concerns

48 – the DPS makes the decision about accompanying the Prime Minister or not, I had no choice but to take them on holiday to Hawaii

49 – I did not mislead the House (4)

50 – oh, maybe our SAS soldiers were in the Kabul hotel gun fight but they weren’t wounded by friendly fire

51 – New Zealand has lost $12 billion from GDP due to the Christchurch earthquake . . . oh, it might actually be around $15 billion from GDP due to the Christchurch earthquake . . . Blinglish said what?

52 – 10,000 houses will have to be demolished in Christchurch due to the earthquake

53 – 14,000 new apprentices will start training over the next five years, over and above the number previously forecast

54 – Our amendments to the ETS ensure we will continue to do our fair share internationally

55 – we are committed to honouring our Kyoto Protocol obligations

56 – any changes to the ETS will be fiscally neutral

57 – we [NZ] have grown for eight of the last nine quarters”

58 – National Ltd™ will tender out the government banking contract

59 – we will be back in surplus by 2014-15

60 – Nicky Hager’s book “Other People’s Wars” is a work of fiction

61 – unemployment is starting to fall

62 – we have created 60,000 jobs

63 – we have created 45,000 jobs

64 – the 2011 Budget will create in the order of 170,000 jobs

65 – I don’t know if I own a vineyard

66 – no, I did not mislead the House (5)

67 – the Isreali spy killed in the Christchurch quake had “only one” passport

68 – the Police will not need to make savings by losing jobs

69 – GCSB re Kim Dotcom x 3 (that we know about)

70 – I did not mislead the House (6)

71 – I voted to keep the drinking age at 20

72 – New Zealand is 100% Pure

73 – I’ve been prime minister for four years, and it’s really 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year

74 – baseball in New Zealand is attracting more government support

75 – the decision to buy brand new BMWs was made by the Department of Internal Affairs without reference either to their minister or to me

76 – I didn’t have a clue that Ministerial Services, which I am in charge of, was going to buy brand new BMWs

77 – even though two of my ministers knew all about it, I didn’t have a clue that brand new BMWs were being bought.

78 – even though my Chief of Staff met with officials to discuss purchase of the the brand new BMWs, I didn’t have a clue

79 – Labour forced us into buying the brand new BMWs, its their fault

80 – ummm, look, sorry about that BMW thing , it was because I was so upset about the death of a New Zealand soldier and Julia Gillard was visit too

81 – the public demanded that we change the labour laws for The Hobbit

82 – “The Hobbit” created 3000 new jobs

83 – we have delivered 800 extra doctors in the public service

84 – I did not mislead the House (7)

85 – I wasn’t working at Elders when the sham foreign exchange deals took place

86 – I was starting School Certificate exams in 1978

87 – I don’t know who arrived on the CIA jet to visit the spies I am responsible for

88 – reducing barriers to property developers will increase the availability of affordable housing

89 – Labour left the economy in poor shape

90 – forecasts show unemployment will fall

91 – we have closed the wage gap with Australia by $27

92 – Ngati Porou and Whanau Apanui are not opposed to mining

93 – I have not had any meetings with Media Works

94 – our [NZ's] terms of trade remain high

95 – the TPP is an example of democracy

96 – National Ltd™ will use the proceeds of state asset sales to invest in other public assets, like schools and hospitals

97 – New Zealand troops will be out of Afghanistan by April 2013

98 – overseas investment in New Zealand adds to what New Zealanders can invest on their own

99 – overseas investment in New Zealand creates jobs, boosts incomes, and helps the economy grow

100 – National Ltd™ will build 2000 houses over the next two years

101 – there are only 4 New Zealand SAS soldiers in Bamiyan and all working in the area of logistics and planning only

102 – selling state assets will give cash equity to those companies

103 – the Sky City deal doesn’t mean more pokies

104 – there was nothing improper about the Sky City deal

105 – my office has had no correspondence, no discussions, no involvement with the Sky City deal

106 – SkyCity will only get “a few more” pokie machines at the margins

107 – any changes to gambling regulations will be subject to a full public submission process

108 – Sky City has approached TVNZ about the purchase/use of government-owned land

109 – the Auditor General has fully vindicated National over the Sky City deal

110 – there’s a 50/50 chance the Hobbit is going off shore unless we do something

111 – David Shearer has signed up for the purchase of shares in Mighty River

112 – Solid Energy asked the government for a $1 billion capital investment

113 – fracking has been going safely on in Taranaki for the past 30 years without any issues

114 – no front line positions will be lost at DoC

115 – Iain Rennie came to me and recommended Fletcher for the GCSB job

116 – I forgot that after I scrapped the shortlist for GCSB job I phoned a life-long friend to tell him to apply for the position

117 – I told Iain Rennie I would contact Fletcher

118 – for 30 years, or three decades, I didn’t have any dinners or lunches or breakfasts with Ian Fletche

119 – I did not mislead the House (8)

120 – No, I did not say we would follow the US and Australia into a war against North Korea

121 – I paid for that lunch and I’ve got the credit card bill to prove it

122 – I called directory service to get Ian Fletcher’s number

123 – I did not mislead the house (9)

124 – I am honest and upfront

125 – cyber terrorists have attempted to gain access to information about weapons of mass destruction held on New Zealand computers

126 – the illegal spying on Kim Dotcom was an isolated incident

127 – New Zealand has an arrangement to have asylum seekers processed in Australian detention camps

128 – the law which says the GCSB cannot spy on New Zealanders is not clear

129 – the only way net new jobs can be created is by private investors putting their money into businesses in New Zealand

130 – an increase in the number of people looking for work indicates that confidence is returning to the economy

131 – the 10 percent of taxpayers in New Zealand who are the top earners pay 76 percent of all net personal tax.

132 – I did not mislead the House (10)

133 – the substantial wage growth under Labour was eroded by inflation

134 – National Ltd™’s 2010 tax changes were fiscally neutral

135 I did not mislead the House (11)

136 – the bulk of New Zealanders earn between $45,000 and $75,000 a year

137 – Pike River Coal did not put profits and its production ahead of the safety and lives of those 29 workers.

138 – Radio Live had sought advice from the Electoral Commission about my show just before the election

139 – it is because of National Ltd™’s policies that the price of fresh fruit and vegetables has dropped.

140 – the length-of-the-country cycleway will create 4000 jobs.

141 – police training for next year has not has not been cancelled

142 – National Ltd™ has only cut back-office jobs in the health service

143 – The Crown’s dividend stream from the Meridians, the Mighty Rivers of the world is large and there is no motivation to sell assets

144 – Gross.


company structureFew New Zealanders  have woken up to the fact that the court is  being used to  asset strip many of them.  The NZ we grew up in   was  not  very litigious  but with house prices  soaring it is now    worth  you while to sue some one  to get    hold of  their money.

Single New Zealanders are the  prime target.  I recently  worked with a man who  had  had  what he thought was a casual affair   but the cunning  foreign   vixen   made certain that she  kept   popping up in his life to cover off the three years.

They never lived together  for more than a month  and even then there were only  two such ” trial periods”   she  retained he   housing corp home and her benefit throughout .

Now she wants half his house despite the fact that he  is married to some one else  .

Lawyers  are required to use the law only for a lawful purpose, but like  kids out of control  , they are willing to push boundaries to   areas where  logic   does not   go.

Take for example the court proceedings which Stewart and associates have  commenced agaisnt me    on behalf of struck off lawyer  Evgeny Orlov.

Orlov was my lawyer. he took nearly $100,000 from me   , altered my matrimonial property deed ( or allowed it to be altered )  without my knowledge  and consent after I had signed it and  gave what I consider  to be fraudulent invoices.

Four years later he has me in court   for the fourth time  taking me for Bankruptcy for a sum of $3,000  when he  owes me at least $30,000  and  defamation  for  publishing  news stories which  show at  the companies he sets up  through his wife are involved in international money laundering  and fraud. All I did  as to trace the companies  through the companies register ( a public register  ) back to His wife Liliya Sobolevia.

see the story   NZ shell company linked to alleged $150m fraud  the company Falcona Systems Ltd is 100%  owned by   Interhold Registered Office Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, 100% owned by  GENHOLD LIMITED Registered Office Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, owned 100% by TRUST (NZ) HOLDINGS LIMITEDRegistered Office Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, owned 1000% by Liliya Sobolevia  who is Orlovs Wife.

see also  NZ shell company linked to Ukrainian fraud  and New Zealand as a rogue financial state

The Chernomoreneftegas Case: In 2011 companies headed by Vanagels and Gorin won an Ukrainan government order in a tender on behalf of state-owned oil company Chernomoreneftegas, Ukraine’s Black Sea oil producer, for the delivery of $400m worth of oil drilling equipment. The tender was won by Cardiff-registered Highway Investment Processing LLP, which lists Stan Gorin as a director according to the UK’s Companies House. The only other company to “compete” in the tender was Falcona Systems Limited, registered in New Zealand and listing another Latvian, Inta Bilder, as director. It will come as no surprise that this company was founded by Interhold, which lists the ubiquitous Erik Vanagels as a director. In other words, there was no competition for the oil equipment order. The producer’s price for the oil equipment was only $248.5m, so someone made a handsome $150m profit from the deal for doing nothing more than some paperwork. The main oligarch related to this deal is Yuriy Boyko, Ukrainian Minister of Energy and Coal Industry.

Vanagles and Stan Gorin are names of Proxy directors which  repeatedly crop up  in association with  international corruption  and they   both  are still directors of  the companies  which are  part of the Liliya Soboleva  structure .

So there we have it  folks . keep your  eyes closed  for corruption  if you see anything  dont whisper a word  because the Corrupt will us  corrupt lawyers  to  conceal the corruption. they do because they  can  and no one holds them accountable.

level 4 (2)There is nothing that peeves me off more than  persons  who take me to court to waste my time and to cover up their own  actions.

Evgeny Orlov is such a person, and  he uses the  dirty tactics  like filing multiple actions  so that you are  over loaded and with a bit of luck something might  slip past.

The whole idea is that I should feel bullied and intimidated and  pull my neck in.   But this Russian  bully  is not going to do this to me . I will  expose him  for what he is .

He really should not be  doing anything at  all which causes me to look at  his practice.  The reality is   that he would get away with his activities  if he simply did not pick on some one who knows how to investigate. You see in New Zealand we run a system   which is based   on parking a hearse  the bottom of a cliff , we do Little or no prevention work   and the   facilities  which we do have are under resourced and over burdened.

The upshot is that  New Zealand which is  deemed to be the least corrupt  is actually very good at creating a false impression.  this   works   to help make New Zealand scam artists very rich. Most New Zealanders have a very relaxed out look  and they  simply dont concern themselves with things that dont  affect them.   so it is a perfect  back drop for New Zealand to become an international money laundering center.  There are those who are very willing to use this apathy and the very unsound company structures we have .

I Believe that we should be able to warn people  of impeding  danger  and indeed we do have freedom of speech last time I looked.  and that includes freedom of opinion . Not only is what i say beleow my honest opinion  it is  based on  research  and personal experience  it is published so that others dont have to go through what I have had to endure.

The equity group international   is in reality the  premises  of  Equity law barristers  limited . the most prominent activity there now is through  Equity trust International limited.


Orlov was struck off as a lawyer in 2013  but now appears to be  practicing through a proxy lawyer  Julia Leenoh   who was admitted to the bar in March and obtained her practicing certificate  in June.

Since then Orlov has used her services under the guise of   Stewart and associates  equity law  branch  . Julia however  is  apparently not being supervised by any one  except struck off  lawyer   Orlov.

Equity law barristers limited  is owned and directed by Orlov who in   court papers claims that he is  unemployed.

the web site for Equity law has been taken down but  documents  sourced through the archive show that  one of the persons who gave it a glowing testimonial is Steven Green.

Trust and company formation

Green just happens to be a director of  Equity trust  International   along with  Greg Stewart   who operates  an alleged branch of is law firm from Orlovs premises . the company  is   owned by  Liliya Soboleva   wife of  Orlov.

It then does not come as any surprise that the majority of the promotion of he company is done through Orlov , the directors are pretty much invisible apart from  showing on the companies register  and  Steven green putting through many of the   company registrations  for   companies  associated in the press with international money laundering.

Equity Trust International Limited
Phone: +649 303 3001
Fax: + 649 303 2018
Address: Level 4 44 Khyber Pass Rd,
Grafton, Auckland.
Mail Address: PO Box 8333, Grafton, Auckland.

Fake insurance brokers

We have now also located  the fact that a  scam insurance company ran from the same premise  level 4  44 Khyber pass ,  care of  Equity trust International. reference can be seen on the FMA web site .

C/- Equity Trust International Limited
Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road
PO Box 8333
Symonds Street
Auckland 1150
New Zealand

0064 09 303 3001
Email addresses:

Gold and Silver sales

Liliya Soboleva  Orlovs Wife is also  50% share holder in a company called Silvermoney   its web site   is registered to  equity law and again we find it   advertised in Russian  and promoted on a web site  on behalf of Equity trust

Приобретайте золотые или серебряные слитки прямо сейчас! Звоните: +649303-3001 Equity Trust International

 Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road,
Auckland, New Zealand 1023
Phone:+64 9 303-3001
FAX:+64 9 303-2018

Immigration  consultant

Orlov  as a lawyer  could be an immigration consultant, since  being struck off  he lost that  right  but immigration is being promoted  by  equity trust  in Russian of course

Land investment/ realtors 

Greg Stewart and his  wife are involved in real estate  and  so the new  banner for the Equity law  firm  under the guise of Stewart and associates also  now promotes real estate sales.

This  is also reflected in  articles as Land bank loans



Steven Green   set up the bank Breder Suasso   which is  two floors below Orlovs office , it is  the international HQ  for a bank which   shows a photo shopped picture of  a front office Spot the differencerather than revealing the reality . if you are thinking of dealing with this bank please  head the warning given by the reserve bank  with regards to unlisted banks and  off shore  finance companies.

Director for this company is Oleg KHMELEV who has  all the hall marks of being a proxy director.

breder suasso in reality

International tax agents

Equity international tax agents also operate  from the premises, which is  bit of a laugh as  Orlov  the lawyer could not  produce accurate accounts to save himself.

From personal experience  I  can say  that  I was given false invoices By Orlov and Equity law. Invoices which  did no have  invoice numbers, I was told to  rip up invoices I had already paid  and when I asked for time sheets i was double billed .

I took  the complaint to the law society   and four years later   I have had not had one cent back despite Orlov being told to reduce his invoices and refund met  some $30,000.

Instead Orlov has taken Me to court 4 times  every thing  he has been involved in  is in my book fraudulent and I recommend that any one    who deals with Evgeny Orlov or any of  his   so called  enterprises does  so with caution.

 Debt collectors

Black list debt recovery. owned and operated  by Liliya Soboleva and Alexander BUSHUEV.

Alexander BUSHUEV is a director  of several other companies   registerd to  l4v4l e 44 Khberpass . One such company  he has joint directorship with Oleg KHMELEV   who  despite claimign to live in panmure  does nto appear on the electoral roll .
Black list debt recovery was set up in April 2013  .
Registered office for   financial service providers

level 4 (3)

level 4 (1)

hedge marketing

HEDGE MARKET Inc.  is an award winning, fully regulated and licensed online forex and commodities broker.

it is  directed by Daniel Duncan GLYNN of Greenhithe and a Chin-mei HO  of Taiwan who isalso the share holder

Level4,Outsource IT Tower,44Khyber Pass Road,Grafton,Auckland 1150,New Zealand
TEL +64(9)889 1758    +64(7)808 0889    +64(9)951 8707 (Chinese Line)

this company is a  financial service provider

Dragon Forex limited is registered to the united states,   the  web site claims that the company exists   in Swanson street Auckland  but he plaque for the company is outside the  dor of the  equity chambers.

the directors are Colin Craig GARDNER 707/145 Symonds Street, Eden Terrace,   and mr Seung Hwa OH  of Korea , both directors are shareholders  along with a  Seychelles company. APM Capital Limited

this company is a  financial service provider

Excelsior Makerts  Limited.

Listed on the companies register as Excelsior Markets  Limited set up in November 2013   Steven James GREEN  is the  director  by proxy for  EXCELSIOR INTERNATIONAL LTD  31291,, Ras A Khaimah, United Arab Emirates , U.A.E.

this company is a  financial service provider

WTM Markets Limited

director  and shareholder Ejaz SARWAR of  Coventry  UK .

the company was orignally set up by Daniel Duncan GLYNN   and was probably sold on as an off the shelf company for a  foreign person   to establish a new Zealand  entity.

mr  Ejaz SARWAR comes complete with a linked in profile  and   claims to   be in Auckland

this company is a  financial service provider

Uppoint Group Limited

Again a company directed by  proxy director Steven Green  for Brian Alfred EYLER  ,514 Orchard Road, Mifflintown, Pa, 17059 , U.S.A.

It would appear that again this was  an off the self company , simple switch of the share holder and because no information is required  he could be any one.

this company is a  financial service provider

Capital Market Investments Limited

Director  Daniel Duncan GLYNN proxy director  for    shareholer and director  Abdul RASHEED  of Singapore , again a company set up by Mr Glynn ready to be flicked on

again this company is a  financial service provider


Who is Evgeny  Orlov or Eugine Narodetsky?

We cannot be certain about  Evgeny  Orlov ‘s identity  he  claims that he was  Eugine Narodetsky   and came to New Zealand as an 8 year old .If any one knows anything about him I would love to hear.



high courtThere is a real trend in New Zealand to use the court to  conceal corruption

Again I am faced   with more legal action  by those  who pervert the use of the courts   this  time by struck off Lawyer Evgeny Orlov .

This is the  Statement  of claim which he filed , the following  is my    response. The  response has be sworn this is an unsworn  copy  with live links  affidavit defamation filed

I am making it  publicly available to show  how our justice system is being used to   attack those who  show that our companies are being used  internationally  in fraud and crime.

There are many organizations like  Equity International trust and Equity law who facilitate this  .

The World Bank said last year that New Zealand is “the easiest place in the world to set up a business”. Sources say the country’s company registration process has been used over the past few years to run a series of massive money-laundering schemes reaching into eastern Europe.

I am not the only one to link  Equity law to fraud,  this is another quote  The Auckland law firm whose address is on the registration has been accused previously of being linked to international fraud scams.” this comment was made with regards  to a  fraudulent  insurance company. ” A New Zealand-based general insurer that was banned last week by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has been linked to activities including international fraud scams and money-laundering.”

The statement is in relation to  Pacific Blu  presenter Equity trust International  which shares its offices address  with  Equity law barristers limited the office of Struck off  lawyer Evgeny  Orlov. His wife Lillia Sobolevia is   the share holder and the  directors are  Greg Stewart , a lawyer from Alexandra  and Steven Green  the head of the church of scientology.

The  affidavit  response and hyperlinks  are   below  the numbering has gone funny  but the links are here or refer to the  pdf  version affidavit defamation filed


I Grace Haden of Auckland Licenced private Investigator solemnly and sincerely affirm   that;-

  1. These proceedings have been taken By Evgeny Orlov for no other purpose than to use the court to conceal the fact that he and his associated companies are directly connected with international fraud, money laundering, illicit insurance schemes and Banking, through the facilitation of these activities using proxy directors and New Zealand’s unsafe company structures.
  2. The statement of claim is false ,speculative and vexatious , the content of all posts complained of are true and   based on international news reports and information obtained from the companies office . All links are accessible through the URL address and a copy of this affidavit is available under the link


  1. One of the biggest mistake I have made in my life was to engage lawyer Eugyne Orlov aka Eugine Narodetski in 2009.
  2. Orlov totally failed in his obligations as a lawyer and   totally botched my civil proceedings and in my matrimonial proceedings allowed my settlement deed to be changed without   my knowledge or consent.
  3. He was always after more money and at the end of 2010 I put my foot down and insisted on   time sheets. I had by this time received invoices without invoice numbers and despite having paid these I was told by his office   worker to screw them up and throw them out .
  4. The new time sheets which emerged were totally fabricated and   contained duplicate entries. Two easily identifiable ones on invoice 205 and 206   are nothing short of fraudulent accounting
  5. I complained to the law society and this has set him off on a trail of litigation against me. This is the fourth   court proceedings by him since filing my complaint.
  6. The first was in 2011   for alleged harassment, I had not done anything, he just feared that I was going to publish something , this was resolved by ne agreeing not to publish anything about him until after the law society had made its decision.
  7. In November 2012 the law society decided that he had to repay me some $30,000   he told me that that he was not going to pay me back and I issued a statutory demand.
  8. He immediately appealed ( I had not realised that   the appeal time was still open 0 and I discovered the appeal attached to court proceedings to set aside the statutory demand.
  9. Despite stating that I would not enforce the statutory demand due to the appeal, the process continued and I turned up in court not expecting that the grounds for the   appeal being that they claimed I had proceeded against the wrong entity.
  10. The law society had directed Orlov to   reduce his invoices and on that basis I was correct in proceeding against equity Law barristers , but this angle was sworn on me in court and I was not equipped to argue that point. Costs were awarded against me on a 1 a basis.
  11. Bogiatto who had represented equity law sent invoices for some $5,000, I advised him that his calculations were on a 1 B basis and not a 1 A.
  12. Despite this the over inflated sum was sealed. I advised them that the set off act applied due to the   simple fact that I had been invoiced twice by Equity law for items on invoice 205 and 206


  1. I never heard from him again until the LCRO contacted us and set a date.
  1. I was immediately served with these proceedings as was a friend of mine who is not involved in any manner or means. By dragging her into it Orlov has proved that he is acting totally on a speculative basis and intent on using the proceedings in a most vexatious manner.
  2. There has been no communication   prior to being served.
  3. We were originally served with documents which had not been filed in the court.
  4. We were served again a week alter and that time my documents also contained a bankruptcy notice concealed within them.
  5. The bankruptcy was on the basis of the falsely sealed document.
  6. The lawyers involved were uncooperative and I had to go to the court to sort the matter out. I found that there was a second sealed order for some $2,000 less which had never been served on me.
  7. The matter of the fees is due to go before the LCRO in September.

Complaint to the law society

  1. I have made a further complaint to the law society, Orlov is s struck off lawyer . His law firm Equity law barristers appears to remain operational through lawyer Julia Leenoh who was admitted to the bar this year and has held a practicing certificate since June.
  2. Julia   works for Stewart and associates Equity law, which is allegedly a trading name for the branch of Stewart and associates ( Alexandra ) which operates from the premises of Equity law in Auckland. She uses the email address, post office box and phone numbers of Orlov’s former practice and   it appears that she works directly under the supervisor of Orlov.
  3. I believe that Orlov has wanted to give her some hands on experience and has started by targeting me.
  4. I believe that Leenoh is acting as a proxy for Orlov.

The statement of claim

  1. The statement of claim   is extremely broad , it makes allegations that I breached an agreement.
  2. There is no evidence at all that I breached the agreement as the material produced was taken from the web sites in July 2014. The confidential agreement expired when the law society returned it decision.
  3. When Orlov failed to pay me and took me to court I updated the posts to reflect the facts more fully. The excerpts produced are not the posts as they appeared   prior to November 2013 when the agreement was in place. The agreement only related to Orlov and his practice Equity law barristers Limited.

The parties

  1. The first Plaintiff is a company
    1. Owned By Lilia Soboleva, wife of Orlov .
    2. directed By Greg Stewart who is the instructing solicitor in this matter and the man who is providing the   lawyer   by way of a bogus “ branch” so that Orlov can continue to operate his “ law practice “
    3. The second director is Steven Green who appears to administer the company records.   He also provided a testimonial for the fourth Plaintiff Equity Law .



  1. There is much cross over between this company an equity law barristers, the use the dame email address, post office box phone numbers and Evgeny Orlov appears to be the visible face behind it and promotes the company internationally.
  2. The company trades as Trust Nz   Equity Trust International Limited

Registrant Contact Name              Equitylaw ltd

Registrant Contact Address1        Level 4, New Call Tower

Registrant Contact City   Auckland

Registrant Contact Country          NZ (NEW ZEALAND)

Registrant Contact Phone             +64 9 3032008

Registrant Contact Email      

  1. The domain name registration for TRUST-NZ.COM shows

Domain Name: TRUST-NZ.COM
Registrar URL:
Registrant Name: Evgeny Orlov
Registrant Organization: Equity Trust ltd
DNSSEC: unsigned

  1. The web site states “ As a law firm dealing with offshore clients we are often being approached by international agents and consultants whose clients are interested in incorporating a New Zealand company or establishing a foreign trust for international trading and/or asset protection. We are always happy to cooperate with our colleagues and help them to find the best solution for their clients.”
  2. Articles by Orlov on behalf of equity trust

i. Evgeniy Orlov for Equity Trust International February 2013

ii. Equity Trust International LTD is a professional corporate trustee…

iii.      February 29, 2012

iv.      April 6, 2012

v.      May 30, 2012

vi.      June 5, 2012 by Evgeny Orlov, Barrister, Equity Trust International

vii.      July 2, 2012

viii.      July 30, 2012 Evgeny Orlov, Barrister – Equity Law The 21st century has seen an escalating regulation of the banking industry

  1. The   second plaintiff is Orlov’s wife she is the shareholder of the first plaintiff and appears to   be the nominee for all assets for Orlov. She   is the shareholder of several companies which form the basis of the global trust / company empire administered through the equity group

company structure

  1. The company structure in 2012 expanded to some 1500 companies -companies.pdf
  2. The international press had concerns with several of these companies which is   how the posts   originated
  1. The third Plaintiff is Evgeny Orlov also known as Eugine Narodetsky , he was struck off the roll of lawyers last year but still appears to operate Equity law barristers through the proxy a recently admitted lawyer who is working directly under the supervisor of Orlov and appears to be under his direct control.
    1. Orlov was my solicitor in 2009 on matrimonial matters and   on a matter where I exposed corruption   he was very effective at false invoicing but not much else.
    2. He now uses the documents which he failed to overturn as ammunition against me. The reality is that   Mt defence of truth and honest opinion was denied and there was never a formal proof hearing. Is incompetence which is recognised and documented by the court cost me the case, ensured far more expenses and saw an endless   stream of false invoices from the fourth Plaintiff Equity law chambers.
    3. I made a complaint to the law society with regards to the false invoicing in 2011 since then Orlov has taken me to court four times.
    4. This latest attack is accompanied by a bankruptcy action   the affidavit of which I also rely on. He and his company produce false invoices for at least $30,000   and they take me to   court for bankruptcy first on a fraudulent document for about $5,000 and then on a document I have never seen before   for some $3,000 .
    5. On the intituling He claims to be unemployed yet is director of a law firm which he still operates via proxy and   still runs the trust company . This is testimony to his integrity and willingness to deceive the court.
  2. Equity law barristers Limited fourth plaintiff is an incorporated company owned and directed by struck off lawyer Evgeny Orlov. It is operating as usual, still has the signage out   and operates through the Guise of being a branch of Stewart and associate lawyers of Alexandra, a branch   known conveniently as Stewart and associates equity law incorporating both the crests of both firms.
    1. The law firm is central to number of other activities, tax agents, immigration and trust and off shore company agent , the advertising for the overseas trust / companies set up
    2. The company is the alter ego of the third plaintiff a separate legal entity when it needs to be but an extension of himself when it suits. Orlov is the sole director and shareholder
    3. It would appear that since Leenoh obtained her practicing certificate in June Orlov has had to keep her busy and made me the target.

The defendants

  1. The first defendant is a not for profit company which owns a blog but otherwise has not traded. It   exposes corruption which occurs in New Zealand so as to make people aware that New Zealand is not corruption free and to exercise diligence.
  2. The seconded defendant is a licenced private investigator and fraud investigator. I along with others have administration rights to the blog.
  3. The third defendant is a mother of 5 who supports transparency but is not in any was associated with the blog and has no ability to access or post other than through   those who do have access. Her involvement is purely vindictive because she is a friend and associate of mine.

Defamation action

  1. From the time that the posts have gone up Orlov has been aware of them, we drew his attention to them and he has had ample opportunity under section 25 .
  2. Each time the blog has been updated he has had this opportunity, he has never asked for anything to be changed.
  3. When the unfiled documents were served on us   we again advised   Greg Stewart that in the interest of fairness we would allow for the 5 day period to recommence   and could he please advise what needs to be amended   due to being   false.
  4.    We did not receive any response except   to get the same papers served  again this time after they had been filed in court and this time   with a bankruptcy notice   for a matter which I believed had been resolved through the offset act.
  5. There are simply no grounds for defamation as all information in the posts are true based on information in the international press.
  6. Since this action has commenced I have amended the   posts to remove any doubt as   to the toe origin and source of the information.
  7. Since revisiting this issue due to the court proceedings I have uncovered more fraud and deception with regards to the activities   of the Plaintiffs and will hand a full report of my findings to the FMA.

The articles

  1. The articles stem from International press with regards to proxy directors, there is nothing which has not been reported elsewhere and the amount of literature is overwhelming.
  2. Article 1 involves the company Unihold which as can be seen by the diagram above directly traces to Liliya Soboleva .The director of this company was a Latvian drunk named Erik Vanagels
  3. New items which relate to Unihold and the corruption surrounding it is reported in the following articles
  4. Items with regards to Vanagels are summarised in the international press as follows

Among the world of investigators and lawyers who unravel complex frauds, Vanagels is an almost mythical figure. His companies have been involved in a series of financial scandals and alleged frauds. These include:

  1. The Hermitage Capital fund money laundering scandal in which $230m (£146m) was allegedly looted between December 2007 and February 2008 in a fraud involving the fund’s Russian operations.
  2. Technomark Business, a London company, is alleged to have received $43m of stolen Hermitage funds that were wired to a Latvian bank account. Vanagels was a director of Technomark’s parent company.
  3. Mukhtar Ablyazov, who has been sued by BTA Bank, for which he worked, for misappropriating billions of dollars using various companies including British-based Loginex Projects. Vanagels was a shareholder and director of the companies that controlled Loginex.
  4. A Ponzi scheme that operated in America in 2009 — the Rockford Group — routed more than $500,000 illicit funds to a British company, Intercity Transit, according to court filings by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
  5. A Cypriot company in which Vanagels was a director was used as a UK corporate director of Intercity Transit.
  6. Vanagels has not just been caught up in complex financial scandals. In September 2008 Somalian pirates hijacked the Faina, a Ukrainian ship which was carrying 33 Soviet-era tanks, rocket-launch systems and anti-aircraft guns bound for Sudan, which was the subject of an arms embargo. It emerged that the ship had been chartered by Marine Energy Trading Company (METC), a UK firm. Vanagels was a shareholder and director of the companies that owned METC.
  7. More recently, in May 2010, the High Court ruled on allegations that a Shell trader, Evgeny Tikhonov, had hidden commissions in an offshore deal. Tikhonov was acquitted, but Shell is still pursuing him for compensation, along with a company that received some of the funds, T Capital Ltd (TCL).
  8. In a High Court judgment in July 2010, Mr Justice Jack identified a familiar figure. His judgment stated: “TCL was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and Mr Erik Vanagels was the nominee shareholder and director.”
  9. Vanagels has also been named in a financial scandal in Ukraine in which it was alleged that the government was overcharged for pharmaceuticals.

  1. It appears that exactly the same is occurring through new Zealand Vanagels had 282 New Zealand companies registered to him
    1. Most have been struck off two remain with Vanagel as director both of these companies have their registered office at the premises of the   first and fourth Plaintiffs.

i.      Bergstone

ii.      Eurozone

  1. Unihold remains registered at 4/44/Khyber pass and Liliya Soboleva remains the ultimate shareholder, the director has now been changed to Manti EFFROSYNI11 Stavrou Stylianidi Street, Flat 3, Level 2, Nicosia, 2024 , Cyprus
  2. Several other companies which were previously directed by Vanagels also remain registered to the premises of the first and fourth Plaintiffs with new overseas directors.
  3. Web references and reports



















  1. Another company which was managed by one of the companies ultimately owned by the second plaintiff was Falcona systems . The news item NZ shell company linked to alleged $150m fraud refers to Falcona Systems Ltd
    1. Falcona systems is owned by Interhold Limited registered to the address of the first and fourth plaintiffs
    2. Falcona systems through Inter hold , Genhold and trust New Zealand holdings is ultimately owned by Liliya Soboleva the second plaintiff all these companies have their registered office at the premises of the t first and fourth plaintiffs.

i.      Source











  1. Another such company is Corlex sales Limited again registered office Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, Auckland, 1023 , New Zealand shareholder Maxhold- unihold -genhold- Nz trust Holding. And ultimately Soboleva .
    1. Corlex was set up by a Latvian called Voldemar Spatz and a later director was another Latvian called Inta Bilder. Both men are the directors of hundreds of companies around the world including some which have been linked to serious financial scandals.



  1. Director Inta Bilder features in many directorships of the companies ultimately owned by Soboleva the news report the following.
  2. A further   proxy director also holds directorships in   the Plaintiffs companies is Latvian Stan Gorin , all these directors and companies are entwined “The tender was won by Cardiff-registered Highway Investment Processing LLP, which lists Stan Gorin as a director according to the UK’s Companies House. The only other company to “compete” in the tender was Falcona Systems Limited, registered in New Zealand and listing another Latvian, Inta Bilder, as director. It will come as no surprise that this company was founded by Interhold, which lists the ubiquitous Erik Vanagels as a director. “
  3. When most of these scandals occurred the companies office acted and struck off many   entities with these persons as their directors   however some remain the   plaintiffs address level 4 44 Khuber pass is till the registered address for
    1. 2 companies By Erik Vanagles
    2. 12 companies Directed by Inta Bilder

Further companies are registered to the address   for directors who have been named as persons of concern in the international press these persons are

  1. Fernando Enrique MONTERO DE GRACIA of panama who directs
    2. GENHOLD – the company which owned Falcona systems through its subsidiary Interhold




  1. Iosif FRANGOS
    1. 5 companies Iosif appears to be a lawyer Iosif Frangos Law office – Cyprus Law
  2. Edgardo MEDINA Bistrans and TWH group
  3. Anastasia KOUMIDOU, 23 companies all registered to the first and fourth Plaintiffs address, this has all the hall marks of another   Cypriot proxy director “All but one of the remaining live Bilder, Vanagels and Spatz companies, and a few more that have crept in, in the time since 2011, are now directed by three Cypriots: 34 by Manti Effrosyni, 20 by Anastasia Koumidou, and 18 by Petr Zika.”
  4. Leah TOURELEO has four companies registered level 4 44 khyber pass , naked capitalism noted that “But if there are other ‘tells’, such as heavy use of a small set of stooge directors, the outsourcing deal and the underlying network are still detectable. Just such a deal seems to have been going on between GT Group of New Zealand and The Company Net of New Zealand.  Among the tells are GT Group stooge Agnes Jouaneau, shared by GT Group and The Company Net, and Leah Toureleo, who is employed by GT Group and successors, and also shared by GT Group and The Company Net.
  5. Manti EFFROSYNI has a total of 29 active companies at 44 Khyber pass, He is the director of UNIHOLD , INTERHOLD and MAXHOLD his address is 11 Stavrou Stylianidi Street, Nicosia, CY-2023 , Cyprus   which is probably just up the road from KOUMIDOU, Anastasia
    1. He is shown on open corporates to have been involved in 107 New Zealand and 2 United Kingdom
    2. He also gets a mention on naked capitalism New Zealand, Fresh From Its Service to Mexican Drug Lords, Helps Out the Russian Mafia

Oh, here we go, Panama again. Genhold Limited’s director is Fernando Enrique Montero de Gracia, Calle Primera, Panama Viejo, House 496, Panama City, Republic Of Panama. De Gracia is also a director of Pacific Metal Recycling and Trading Ltd, which is wholly owned by Maxhold Limited, whose director is Manti Effrosyni, of Cyprus. Now, if the Russian Mafia is behind this, it’s only right that there would be a Cyprus connection somewhere:”

  1. And also New Zealand: the Shell Company Incorporation Franchises (V) (and Panama and Switzerland)

Genius Management Limited, formerly directed by Erik Vanagels of Panama, then by Manti Effrosyni of Cyprus, is now directed, for no immediately obvious reason, by another Panamanian, Doria Imelda Yunda Mina.

Ah, but here’s the reason: Genius Management has switched company agent too. Its agent is no longer Equity Trust International; as of the 4th March 2014, just a few weeks ago, the agent is Panasuisse (New Zealand) Ltd.”

  1. Petr Zika has 17 companies “Petr Zika, directs BRITHOLD, which is owned by the same GENHOLD Limited mentioned by Stuff. Zika directs another 124 New Zealand companies. The network is getting bigger!”
  2. Roger Alberto SANTAMARIA DEL CID directed 28 companies at one time his address is Colinas Del Sol, Main Street, House 219, Republic Of Panama ,he currently directs just one which is about to be struck off
    1. He features in Faux Corporate Directors Stand in for Fraudsters, Despots and Spies
    2. October 2010, Santamaria was named in press reports as the Panamanian contact for an Internet investment scam, Imperia Invest IBC, which defrauded 14,000 investors worldwide of about $7 million. They included about 6,000 deaf people from the U.S. states of Utah, Maine, Wisconsin and Texas.
    3. “A Florida-based task force that specializes in detecting and uncovering massive fraud schemes brought the EMG/Finanzas Forex case last year. Del Cid, Perfect Money’s purported contact person in Panama, is listed as EMG’s “Secretary” in court filings that allege that tens of millions of dollars seized in the probe were tied to the international narcotics trade.”
    4. Furthermore, in the wacky offshore world of Philip Burwell’s IOS, there is precedent for a New Zealand company suddenly ditching its Latvian stooge director for a Panamanian stooge director. For instance, you can see Latvian Inta Bilder replaced by Panamanian Roger Alberto Santa Maria Del Cid as director of Normiso Limited.
  3. Christina Van den bergOnly one NZ company is active   the address 44 Khbyer pass first registered 13 Mar 2013
    2. After the legendary Vanagels and Gorin, a new generation of nominee directors has born.

Further fraudulent companies

  1. It is not just the directors of the companies which the plaintiffs facilitate who are seen by the world as Undesirable but   they also register and   facilitate other   scams such as this reported on the FMA web site,-alerts-and-scams/names-of-firms-and-individuals-to-be-wary-of#PacificBluL.P

Pacific Blu L.P (Limited Partnership)

C/- Equity Trust International Limited
Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road
PO Box 8333
Symonds Street
Auckland 1150
New Zealand


General Partner:
Streamline Enterprises Corporation
0832-00680 World Trade Centre

Angel Lorenzo

0064 09 303 3001

Email addresses:

Reason for publishing: False/misleading advertising.

Published on this site December 2013

Pacific Blu was registered as a Limited Partnership on 24 January 2013 by the Registrar of Companies, New Zealand, pursuant to the New Zealand Limited Partnerships Act 2008.
A person cannot be in the business of acting as an insurer in New Zealand unless they are registered on the New Zealand Financial Service Providers Register for that service. Pacific Blu is not included on this Register. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand, which is responsible for licensing insurers carrying on business in New Zealand, also does not include Pacific Blu on its list of licensed insurers.

  1. The FCA warns that customers may not be aware that they have entered into an unregulated insurance contract under which there appears to be no regulatory protection.
  6. New Zealand-based general insurer that was banned last week by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has been linked to activities including international fraud scams and money-laundering.”

“The Auckland law firm whose address is on the registration has been accused previously of being linked to international fraud scams.”

The World Bank said last year that New Zealand is “the easiest place in the world to set up a business”. Sources say the country’s company registration process has been used over the past few years to run a series of massive money-laundering schemes reaching into eastern Europe.

Last year New Zealand was removed from a European Union banking and corporate “whitelist” for having insufficient legislative safeguards against money-laundering and terrorist financing.  Russia was removed from the list at the same time

Other services provided

  1. claimed to be A division of Equity Law Barristers
    1. The web site is now closed but an archived copy is still available there it would appear that Orlov lost his capacity to give Immigration advice when he was struck off

  1. Banking , Orlov   wrote an article about Banking in New Zealand July 30, 2012 Evgeny Orlov, Barrister – Equity Law The 21st century has seen an escalating regulation of the banking industry
  2. His associate Steven Green through the first Plaintiff facilitate the setting up of BREDER SUASSO LIMITED.
  3. In the constitution it states The Company” means RAY’S LIMITED; which connects this to another trail of overseas companies
  4. The directors consent was completed by Steven James GREEN ( EQUITY TRUST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ) Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass Road Grafton
  5. The company operates from Level 2, 44 Khyber Pass Road, Grafton, it is listed as an Off shore bank but is not registered as a bank in New Zealand
  6. The International Head office reported to be 44 Khyber pass and shows and impressive office, this picture however is fraudulent having been taken from a interior design web site

  1. The office is unattended and the matter has been reported to the FMA.
  2. The other director Mr Oleg KHMELEV has other companies associated with the first and fourth plaintiffs and appears to be a local proxy director.
  1. I worked from the premises of Equity law in 2006 the then receptionist was also one of these proxy directors, she later contacted me and advised me that she felt very uncomfortable about this and I helped her resign. He companies were then passed on the Leah Toureleo of Vanuatu as director.

Addressing allegations in the statement of claim.

  1. Item 20 states the items remain published on the web sites.. yes they do  they are true   of public interest , news worthy and  they are not there to attack any one .
  2. item 21 statement of claim  Not one of the items referred to state that there is any intention, it merely shows an ongoing relationship with these proxy directors , it would appear that the interpretation of the posts have been taken completely out of context.
  3. Item 22.   This makes no sense at all   paragraph 19   states “The First and Second Defendants caused to be published or published on the website mentioned in paragraph [16] one article whose text and dates of publication are particularised below. “ The entire posts as the stood in July 2014 are then   printed.
  4. Item 22.1 The photographs identify who the directors are.
  5. Item 22.2 the publication merely connects the costs for setting up companies with the number of companies.   I can deduce from that the Orlov’s plea of poverty   is dubious.
  6. 22.3 this is a straight question and linked to a relevant external new item the facts are below all these companies   mentioned and the directors come under the plaintiffs umbrella ‘Falcona Systems main shareholder is Interhold Ltd, of Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass, Grafton, Auckland…

This location seems to have a profusion of alternative versions in the register; for instance:

Level 4 Outsource It Tower, Grafton, Auckland 1150, New Zealand
Level 4 Newcall Tower, 44 Khyber Pass, Grafton, Auckland , New Zealand
Level 4, 44 Khyber Pass, Grafton, Auckland

Simply searching the register for “44 Khyber Pass” gives 1036 active companies. Evidently this too is a popular address for company registrations, so perhaps that is an overcount. Narrowing the search to the known-to-be-dodgy “Level 4 Khyber Pass” still gives 594 results though. Yikes!

Back to Stuff, who were talking about Interhold Limited:…It, in turn, is owned by Genhold Ltd, of the same address, with a Panama-resident director.

Oh, here we go, Panama again. Genhold Limited’s director is Fernando Enrique Montero de Gracia, Calle Primera, Panama Viejo, House 496, Panama City, Republic Of Panama. De Gracia is also a director of Pacific Metal Recycling and Trading Ltd, which is wholly owned by Maxhold Limited, whose director is Manti Effrosyni, of Cyprus. Now, if the Russian Mafia is behind this, it’s only right that there would be a Cyprus connection somewhere:

Typically, Russian investors create “brass-plate” companies to take advantage of Cyprus’s low 10% corporate tax rate. Many of these funds are reinvested back in Russia – ¤1.4bn [sic] in 2008 – avoiding Russian tax. The Cypriot authorities angrily deny that the island is a haven for money laundering. They also point out that Russians invest more cash in Austria and the UK.

But many analysts are sceptical: “We are talking about Russian money laundered through Cyprus. The Russian mafia uses Cyprus extensively,” said Hubert Faustmann, associate professor of European studies at Nicosia University. “This is why Russia has no interest in Cyprus going down economically.”

Tax havens and organized crime go together like dung and flies. Well, we knew that.Anyway, via the Cyprus connection, another modest opportunity to trump Stuff’s piece turns up: Manti Effrosyni is in fact the director of 88 other New Zealand companies. Meanwhile another Cyprus resident, Petr Zika, directs Brithold, which is owned by the same Genhold Limited mentioned by Stuff. Zika directs another 124 New Zealand companies. The network is getting bigger!

  1. 22.4 No it does not have fraudulent innuendo it shows that people who were alert to their environment got out while the going was good.   I can call many lawyers   to back me up on this one, how many will be enough?
  2. 22.5. I do have to wonder about Mr Stewart. Again honest opinion   must people have seen through Orlov but I have to admit he is very persuasive and always makes the other person out to be the bad guy, including the courts.
  3. 22.6 I think the evidence of the bank Breduer Suasso and the Insurance Company Blu pacific speak for themselves.
  4. 22.7 The fact that Eric Vanagels still operates companies through the plaintiffs to me proves that the activities of the companies he supposedly directs is condoned by them.
  5. 22.8 as can be seen with Breder Suasso, companies are already registered ready to change their names and bring in foreign shareholders and directors. This is an observation from fact and honest opinion.
  6. Paragraph 25?? Paragraph 17 states The Second and Third Defendants jointly control and administer the content of a website titled Transparency International New Zealand. This is total speculation   and no truth to this what so ever
  7. 26. The statement is false yes we agree the statement that   Rochelle and I administer the web site is false.
  8. 26.1   The evidence speaks for itself, the companies  in their company structure run by the proxy directors are involved in international money laundering, and the plaintiffs provide the frame work to facilitate it. Truth
  9. 26.2 That statement has not been made, however the newspaper items show that the address and the companies ultimately owned by the second plaintiff are frequently involved in international crime. If she felt uncomfortable with her connection with the crime she could resign and close down the companies.
  10. 26.3 I never said that they did   I do know that when Liliya was the office administrator she issued invoices without invoice numbers on them.. To me that is tax avoidance.
  11. 26.4 facts speak for themselves. They provide directors   as proxies. That is never the intention of New Zealand company law.
  12. 26.5 The news items   show that the companies which are direct subsidiaries   of the companies owned by the second plaintiff and administered by the   first plaintiff are associated with the international events. These companies would not exist if it were not for them.
  13. 27. The first defendant is a corporate it cannot have   its own intention or be malicious, the items published in the name of the first defendant were as shown based on international news items derived from many sources.
  14. 29 The New Zealand Company’s office has been striking off companies with proxy directors.   This is directly due to the integrity of the companies and nothing to do with anything   that he defendants may have said or done.
  15. 29.2 The fact that the first Plaintiff lost money is not my problem   see the ministry of economic development about that and the new laws. I am not a scape goat
  16. 29.3 The second plaintiff became a mother last year, this frequently has an effect on income. Also the international press reporting her involvement   may well have had an impact on   matters and not just anything that may have bene published on She is still a director of many companies. Including new ones registered in the past year.
  17. 29.4   the cause of this may be the tightening of our company laws and the spot light on the activities at level 4   44 Khyber pass. Including Orlov being struck off as a lawyer
  18. 29.5 hope the IRD looks at this in contrast to previous earnings.
  19. 29.6 becoming a mother losing your job at the law firm which had its owner struck off would  have this kind of effect. I lost similar sums when I  became a mother
  20. 30 the terms were confidential,   confidentially which the third plaintiff has breached. The application was his not because I had done anything but he must have feared what I could find out. It was totally vexatious. I have not breached it, the law society has made its decision the agreement has lapsed. The extracts provided were not those which were up on the site at the time when the agreement was in place.
  21. 31 this provision was complied with Liliya Soboleva and Equity trust international were not part of the agreement.
  22. 32 the first defendant was not part of the   agreement. I was not the sole director and shareholder, the   plaintiffs have to get their facts rights.
  23. The agreement was not breached I have no control over the international press.


  1. My defence is truth, I have not stated anything which has not been reported in the overseas press.
  2. The plaintiffs have been given the opportunity to provide evidence as to why the statements made were not truthful and have failed to provide anything.
  3. It appears that this court action is being taken against me and my associate for no other reason as to incur legal expenses stress and     waste time.
  4. I hope that I have not wasted my time as the full investigation that I have had to undertake will be sent to the international press consortiums who are focused on New Zealand.
  5. It is my professional opinion that through the company structures and the directors which the plaintiffs are involved with, that they are facilitating criminal matters of international significance   which reflect badly on New Zealand


  1. The action is vexatious   as ample opportunity for correction has been given
  2. There is no   “contempt of court” as I abided with the agreement, it has now expired and   screen dump taken in July 2014 is not evidence of what was on the site prior to November 2013.
  3. This matter is an example of how people who facilitate criminal behaviour use the civil jurisdiction of the court   to beat up those who expose illicit activity.


  1. The reason I am self-represented is that the last time I engaged a lawyer he was incompetent and over charged. And while the law society struck him off, I have been left with massive financial deficit and no support in putting right the   wrong and the injustice which Orlov has brought   about.
  2. The investigations into this matter have been huge and I hope the court will compensate for that, but in any case Orlov won’t pay   and the sport of this is to show that he owes me $30,000 plus but can make me pay him.
  3. He is using the court to pervert the course of justice he should be charged with criminal offences.

Affirmed at Auckland this 19 th day of August 2014

Before me


It is timely with Nicky Hager‘s  publication of Dirty politics that  we examine the corruption behind the  dirt.

I am in the process of putting together my  submissions for the select committee  to  substantiate my  petition for an Independent commission agaisnt corruption .

I have already done an informal post Why I initiated a Petition for a commission against corruption.

On that post we covered off  several headings  our concerns with regards to the  rather nontransparent system which appears to be operating in parliament. All the  issues   can be attributed to one single  underlying  problem .  There is no code of conduct for members of parliament .

Labour MP Ross Robertson has for the past 13 years been battling   to get Parliament to  accept a code of conduct for MPs. see story

There is a cabinet manual  which touches on  Code of conduct and holds ministers   accountable to the  Prime Minister for their behaviour. This however does not extend to   members of parliament who are not ministers they are responsible to their party leaders.

New Zealand MPs do have a register of pecuniary interest  the requirements for this are set out in  appendix B  of the standing orders .

The   returns are found   at this link . Again as  with so many registers in New Zealand there is nothing which compels the truth  and no consequences for  deliberate omissions.  The integrity  of the register is  therefor  solely dependent on the integrity of those who  provide the information.

In Australia we see a different scene  and a magnificent summary which  also    looks at New Zealand  and notes that

The parliamentary practice states that :

As occasion requires, ministerial guidelines may be issued by the Cabinet or the Prime Minister to deal with particular circumstances that have arisen (such as the conduct to be observed by Ministers involved in mayoral election campaigns). However, these ministerial codes of conduct are political guidelines adopted by Governments to guide their own conduct. They have no statutory origin and are not regarded as being legally enforceable. Their significance depends upon the sense of commitment to public office held by Ministers and on their political responsibility to Parliament and public opinion.

New Zealand Parliamentary Practice notes that:

Except in the case of financial interests, the House has not adopted any detailed ethical guidelines for its members, taking the view that advice about appropriate behaviour is primarily a matter for induction training and internal party discipline.

And so it  is that the system  which operates in Our government today   revolves around the prim ministers top drawer.

Conduct which should be independently  investigated is retained until a suitable   ” spat arises”  party Politics are never far  away and we are constantly reminded that the  governance is   a war between left and right.

While  it is the conduct of  the house which should be considered we find  that  the  protects its members as  do the other parties.

Being the prime minister allows better access than any one   to the dirt  and  you simply hold on to it  to trade off    and save the neck of one of your own.

it is of note that  the code of conduct and ethics is linked to    ICAC particularly  involving Lobbying.   It appears that elections may be    time for open slather  of those wishing  favours  in the   forth coming terms  to help  provide a leg up   for the party who  is to deliver   the goods. see this link .

The   open door to the Westminster  style  of  parliament is that   it places the prim minister   in total control of the conduct  of the ministers  and the Prime minister  does not even require  formal parliamentary  authorization  to alter amend or interpret anything   he likes  as he likes.

It is therefore a matter of playing the game   and while we frown upon bullying in the playground, the same tactics are essential  for  political  survival.   Its all count getting   your bum on  the hot seat so that you can steer  your  country   for  what  could well be  private  financial  gains.     why not?    we dont have  any  law agaisnt  it!

money launderingNew Zealand  is renowned for  its ease of settling up a company.  A company is a new legal person  and separate legal entity.  Each company  generally has  the same rights and privileges in law afforded to a real   or natural person .( the type that  breathes )

There appears to be two sets of  standards though  one afforded to natural  people  the other to   legal persons (  corporates )

A real person  takes 9 months to develop  in utero  and 18 years after their  birth attains  legal  age where  he/she  can    own property , make independent decisions , sign contracts   etc. there are no short cuts  and you cannot cheat . Claiming a false age  , false parenthood,  nationality , identity  are generally considered serious offences.

Then there  is the second type of person  the corporate.. body of persons  or  company. – the legal person

The legal person   can be  created by any one in the world , all it takes is an online trip to the  NZ  companies office.   You will need a NZ address but no one will check if you actually live there.  if you dont live there they will ask yo to update the records.

It has  been made slightly trickier now  due to  the requirement   for  a log in  but   dont fret  there is noting that a few $$  wont overcome, there are plenty agencies willing to help

You dont even need to be truthful  about  the ownership   of the company and this can be disguised  behind trusts and behind other persons called nominees. Not only will you for  the princely sum of $160  get a New Zealand company  you will also have  a NZ identity.

To avoid   displaying the  overseas ownership  of  your new company you can use  an address in New Zealand  you could use a friends address and  perhaps use the  motel that you stayed in  the last time you  visited.

We have seen directors  and share holders who are one and the same  using different name  and different signatures.  the   system is    open to such abuse that  it is limitless… one checks.

As director  you  can use your middle name  and mothers surname  or  what every you   feel like being known as this week    you should be a real person  but as we will show  in our example   imaginary people  can be directors    and liquidators. .The good news is  we no longer have a national  Enforcement unit  we have an integrity unit  who  simply ask you to correct the details.   No penalties for Bullshit here.

So imagine if a foreigner wants to purchase real estate in NZ but  cant get authority,   they can  set up a company  ,  use it to set up a second company   and buy   a house.  They  can then  on sell the   company and the assets without any need for    conveyancing.  and the house  will  transfer as   part of the   assets of the company.

In short the company registration is totally  unsafe and   only the records of honest people have integrity .

The Transparency International  Integrity report  recognized that

  the ease of company registration  has been exploited for fraudulent purposes by international actors and New Zealanders.

This is compounded   by the lack of due diligence  employed by our companies office   and lack of enforcement.

New Zealand companies are  an invitation to international money laundering.

There is no  doubt  that there are laws in place to deal with  fraudulent application to the   companies office but these are no longer  enforced.

The last    published  conviction is for  DR Gerald WATERS,  who was  running a company for  scamster Jonathan Mann   Waikato doctor fights convictions  and also see Jonathon Mann seeks to silence victims  and

Several years ago I was  also involved on the periphery of a case with a fictional director and   liquidator
Fresh Prepared Limited  owed a lawyer  $64,000.  the company  was directed by Lynne PRYOR  Unit 1, 135 Grey St, Onehunga, Auckland she directed it on behalf of her boss Terry Hay , (Business partner of David Nathan )Instead of  paying the lawyers  Hay on sold the company to  Sanjay PATEL  01 Nov 2006 who on 30 Jan 2007 appointed Liquidator Babubhai Patel  of Papakura.  It transpired that both ” men”  were fictional  Babubhai  even shifted  to Mumbai and his affidavits  witnessed by a solicitor in Shanghai .Fortunately in those days there was such a thing as  National enforcement unit in the  companies office , one which actually prosecuted.  Lynne PRYOR and Terry Hay were both charged with   some 22 fraud offences . see news items Charges over alleged fake liquidator  and  Boss invents accountant to escape $60k debt . Hay   took off to Honolulu his home turf  and stayed   low  until  Pryor had been dealt with in the  courts ,  she was able to  bargain away 21 charges as Hay was the prime offender. Lynne Pryor was disqualified from  being a director   but she  remains at the premises which have now become a new company doing the same as before , business as  usual , her brother Graham Pryor is supposedly her supervisor . this company is now called Salad foods  . Salad foods share holding is  hidden in a solicitors trust, but it used to be Terry Hay  whose financial interests were in this company.

The transition of Fresh prepared into salad Foods was not  simple for a bit there there was another company in the mix   SALAD FOODS (1992) LIMITED  directed and allegedly owned by  Gui Li , Hays girlfriend at the time  who used her parents  Shanghai address.

Hay managed to  have the  charges dropped after he had  done a deal with government the response is on FYI  Download View as HTML

But sadly it appears that these falsehoods are  now condoned.   I have always noted that when ther is no consequence to an action   the abuse will increase.

This  brings me back to this weeks Chinese company   care of the British Virgin Island .

Milk New Zealand Investment  was allegedly the share holder   but had no real   identifiable existence.

Yesterday the   entry was changed on the companies register. the company is now shown as

Milk New Zealand Investment Limited  Offshore Incorporations Centre, Road Town, Tortola , British Virgin Is.

All changed with the   flick of a pen  effectively having the  effect of transferring the beneficial  ownership of massive blocks of New Zealand pasture and all done apparently without a shred of evidence. I have requested  the proof. will keep you posted

truthThere are Many New Zealanders who know all too well  of the corruption in New Zealand.  There are also many who  dismiss   corruption as a conspiracy theory.

Invariably the ones  who agree with every word I say are the ones who have been exposed to corruption and found that it is  wave that  washed over you and consumes assets  on the way .

The only people who do not see corruption are the ones in denial   who  desperately want to believe the rhetoric because of the financial advantage it holds for them.

Amateur sleuths  can have a field  day  with uncovering corruption in New Zealand   but most are foiled by the presumption that  ” things will have been done properly.” The reality is that we  do not have proper systems or safe guards in place and our company  registration is easily  foiled

Trading names  are commonly used and it is not  unusual to find that   companies swap names   or trade in the name of another company.  so  it is always important o know who you are actually dealing with.

You can buy a house in the name of a company  and  then on sell the company , there by changing the   directors and share holders of the company and   the assets transfer  to new  owners without need  for  conveyancing as the ownership of the  property has not changed,  just change in   ownership of the company.

Like any magic trick  you   dont believe it can be done until you see  how it is done, then  you will notice  that it is  happening more  than  you ever thought.  its like buying a purple car, once you have one you see them every where. The reality is that nothing has changed only  that   you now  have an awareness.

Looking at the companies involved in  the Milk New Zealand   group of companies  , it is noted that the company Milk New Zealand Investment Limited  does not appear on the New Zealand register   but  it appears on the  company genealogy .

Rumour has it  that  the company is registers in the  British virgin Island, but even if it does  there is no evidence to show that this is he company  which is the share holder  of the multi million dollar  chain of companies.

We have already seen that  the Chinese company Hunan Roland animal husbandry Co., Ltd. is  selling off shares in our land.  

Our company  registration is   so unsafe that   it is a possibility that this company which has never been considered as  a potential purchaser is the actual owner of our land .

we can only wait and see.   time  will tell .

dairy-farm-for-saleOver the past days we have been looking at the Chinese companies which purchased  the Crafar farms .

We looked  at the decisions of the OIO ( over seas investment office )  and found that a Hong Kong company  Milk Investment Holding  limited to register a company in New Zealand .

There had been no mention of any intermediaries and the companies registration registered a shareholder  which could not be located .

Through  Chinese documents we could only speculate that the company referred to  was  a  British virgin Island  company.

Today I was  alerted  to a new  document which  was produced when considering  the  sale  of the Synlait Farms  .

This application makes  far more sense than the Crafar  farm application   and  it includes  a flow diagram of  ownership on the very last page .Flow diagram

The application correctly   considers the  company SFL  Holding as being the   purchaser of the  Syfield farms. SFL was the purchaser.

Where as  in the Crafar application   Milk New Zealand Holdings  Hong Kong was considered  as the applicant  but they were not the purchaser, the ultimate purchaser being   set up after the decision in a most  non transparent manner  as previously discussed and  first  going through an off shore tax haven.

It also brings up the issue in the case of the Synfield farms  : there is actually not a physical connection  from Milk New Zealand Holdings in Hong Kong to Milk New Zealand Holdings in New Zealand .  It is impossible to  trace that connection from  company registration  as the   share holders application form milk New Zealand investment shareholder does not comply with our laws  and does not  disclose    that the share holder  has a registered office in the British virgin Islands.

Just because  some one says it is so   and because it shows on a flow diagram does not make it fact.  Trust but verify

This leaves me wondering  what evidence was produced   to   establish the  flow chart and the degree of  due diligence  that has been done .   Like any chain   its only as strong as its weakest link.  In this case the evidential  chain is  entirely broken .

The document obtained through Reuters and discussed in  yesterdays blog  brings another  concerning   twist .

There are other companies in the mix which have never been considered  , this company  fits  in below Shangai Pengxin  as  follows . It is this company  Roland  animal Husbandry which claims  ownership in out farms  and is making a non public share offering for them  as set out in  the article Are Crafar, Synlait and Lochinver about to be ON SOLD by the Chinese?

In the mean time there  are questions to be asked  I  forwarded  forward  OIAs.


will keep you posted

off shoots & broken links


collins milkMy very wise mother always told me that once you part with something, sell it off or give it away  , you lose control over it. It looks to me  that we have lost control over  our  farm land  as it appears that it  about to change hands within China.

The overseas investment office  did  due  diligence on the purchasers of  the Crafar farm- Milk New Zealand Holding  Hong Kong , the report directed that this company should set up as a New Zealand company.Part 18 Overseas companiesof the  Companies Act provides for this.

A new company named Milk New Zealand Holding  appeared on our registry n its share holder   was not Milk New Zealand Holding  HK  , and neither  was this registration  that of an over seas company.

Instead the share holder was listed as Milk New Zealand Investment Limited Suite 1, 139 Vincent Street, Auckland Central, Auckland, 1010 , New Zealand see post A closer look at the 2 Milk New Zealand Holding Limited companies

On discovering a  Chinese document  on Reuters  more   has become apparent

BRIEF-Dakang Pasture Farming to raise up to 2.5 bln yuan in private placement for New Zealand acquisition

(Reuters) – Hunan Dakang Pasture Farming Co Ltd

* Says plans to raise up to 2.51 billion yuan ($404.25 million) via private placement of shares, proceeds will be used to acquire two pastures in New Zealand

Source text in Chinese:;see transaltion  Hunan Roland animal husbandry Co., Ltd. 

 The second  document  indicates the possibility  that the share holder may be  the company registered in  the British Virgin Islands.

Due to the nature and secrecy of  this registration  we cannot be sure if Milk NZ holdings  HK is the 100% share holder  of this company   or even if this company is the  shareholder of the New Zealand   company Milk NZ holdings, thepossibility is that another company with an identical name exists some where else  hidden in a tax haven  which will come forward int he future and claim to be the shareholder.

Another possibility is  the the chain of ownership  could be through more than one  company   with several intermediaries between the company which the due diligence was done on and the  ultimate purchaser a process during which the share holding of the BV   investment company was diluted and now  is not 100%  Shanghai Pengxing, through subsidiaries.

When company structures become complicated there is  always a reason  and the reason only becomes clear with hind sight.

The Reuters document  also  alludes to the  sale of our farms though shares  the report is not one of  Shanghai Penxin  is is  of Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd. Hunan Health Board

This company on a flow chart as  55%  controlled by Shahai Pengxin and the ownership of the  farms is attributed to th is company  in the report   see translated  documentation Husbandry Co., Limited Hunan Kang non Public offering plan ( per  Google translate )

the statement which I believe needs explanation   is  this

After the net proceeds will be used to: (1) the acquisition of New Zealand’s North Island Ranch and transformation projects; (2) the acquisition of New Zealand Los Cen ranch and improvement projects. In the implementation of the acquisition, the company will acquire new use Pengxin Group to raise funds Stake in the Hong Kong company (including its underlying company), and the Hong Kong company indirectly owned by North Island Ranch  Entitled to, and the Hong Kong subsidiary has signed agreements to acquire the Los Cen ranch. Pengxin Group through the acquisition of new Hong Kong companies, Roland will indirectly take ownership of livestock pasture North Island, and can be implemented on the ranch of Los Cen

source Chinese document  translation  Husbandry Co., Limited Hunan Kang non Public offering plan

Time to look at the players 

Terry Lee

1 December 2009  Lee  became director of Westlake capital Registered office Gilligan Shephard.

2 December 2009  Lee together with  Xing Hong and Stone Shi became directors of KIWI DAIRY CORPORATION LIMITED Registerd office Gilligan Shephard.  Westlake capital  is the shareholder   This company  became Oravida NZ  LTD on 13 may 2011

3 December 2009 Lee together with  Xing Hong and Stone Shi became directors of Registerd office Gilligan Shephard.  This company  became ORAVIDA PROPERTY LIMITED on 27 June 2011

Oravida property limited  owns 8  titles . It has to be noted that  ORAVIDA PROPERTY LIMITED formed  22/7/2011 changed its name to KIWI DAIRY INDUSTRY LIMITED 27/7/11

18 Nov 2010 Terry Lee sets up a new company and   Westlake capital becomes 100% share holder MILK NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION LIMITED.  Zhaobai JIANG  becomes a director   On 02 Sep 2011  and acquires 50% of this shareholding  2 July 2014 . this company is not involved in any of the land purchases.

28 September 2010  Terry Lee resigns  from Oravida portfolios

30 September  2010 Terry Lee & Zhaobai JIANG set up  Nature pure Limited  60 % Milk New Zealand Holding Limited Kong Kong   40% Westlake shareholding .  this company  is not involved in any o f the land purchases .

My red flags

Terry Lee   is the sole person to  update the company registers  and  file now directors shareholders etc.

It is  to me extremely odd that the  Director is  doing this task

It is also odd that    the Hong Kong company   which has shareholding in New Zealand  simply did not  become the  shareholder of the New Zealand company or register here.

To me the registration of Milk New Zealand  holdings is  deceptive  as the  statement of the share holder is so deficient that there is no proof of existence.

I also notice that Mr Jiangs signatures are not consistent  and I have to wonder if some one else is signing for him at times.

The revelations  of  the   assumed ownership of  the land  By  Rolands  is worrying and  I  have to wonder if the Chinese  like myself have worked out  how  our companies registration process   has more holes in it  than  a seive.

We need an urgent  inquiry .




the_emperors_new_clothesThe Society for promotion of community standards   did some delving on another tangent   and found references to a  document reported on reuters .

The document  itself is in Chinese but thanks to Google translate we have been able to deduce that  as SPCS suspected , there is aBritish Virgin Islands company in the mix.

This is turning out to be a bit like the Emperors new clothes, we are told that the company is there but we cannot see any  evidence of that on the New Zealand register  and just like the emperors clothes   there is no legally binding evidence which proves that the   company which is the shareholder of  Milk New Zealand Holdings ( NZ )  is theBritish Virgin islands company or not.   All we can do is assume and if you  assume  you  can be wrong. this is the application form milk New Zealand investment shareholder

The only evidence which we have  which  alleges that this is the  share holding company  is in the  documents obtained from Reuters. We also do not have any evidence other that the words in the  Chinese document that  the shareholding of the British Virgin Islands company is 100 %, if not  then  there  are potentially other purchasers  in the mix.

There appears to be no mention on the New Zealand registry or  Linz that  the  applicant  for the purchase of the land was to  set up  a company in New Zealand through an intermediary.  I have to ask  why  go through the British Virgin Islands. certainly not transparent.

We have  captured the flow chart from the  document and provided a translation flow chart translation flow chart translation _Page_1 flow chart translation _Page_2
















the issue  which remains is that  the company  registered in New Zealand as   the holding company   does not show the   share holder as being a  British Virgin Island  company.

It is precisely this lack of transparency which leaves our company office over to  abuse by others.

We  request an urgent investigation into  whether or not t his is the  BVI company  and see to have evidence of it existence recorded on the companies register.

Another issue which arises is that the document in Paragraph 5  states ( again courtesy of  Google translate )

5, the company’s non-public offering to raise funds not more than 2.51 billion yuan of total net proceeds after deduction of related issuance costs will be used to: (1) the acquisition of New Zealand’s North Island Ranch and transformation projects; (2) the acquisition of New Zealand Los Cen ranch and improvement projects. In the implementation of the acquisition, the company will use the raised funds to purchase Pengxin Group newly established Hong Kong company (including its underlying company) shares, and the Hong Kong company will indirectly owns North Island pasture, and the Hong Kong subsidiary signed a Los Cen ranch purchase agreement. Hong Kong company through the acquisition of the newly established Pengxin Group, Roland indirectly acquired ownership of the North Island livestock pastures, and can be implemented for Los Cen ranch acquisitions. 

see more of the translation  here June 2014.  would  love it if some  one would dedicate the time to do the entire document. full Chinese document here .